Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 22;26(9):2447. doi: 10.3390/molecules26092447

Table 1.

Statistical results from the GC–IMS analysis (95% confidence intervals are in brackets). Positive predictive value (PPV); negative predictive value (NPV).

Comparison Classifier AUC Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
HCC vs. Fibrosis Random Forest 0.97
(0.91–1.00)
0.43
(0.13–0.75)
0.95
(0.86–1.00)
0.75
(0.33–1.00)
0.83
(0.68–0.95)
HCC vs.
Non-Fibrosis
Random Forest 0.62
(0.48–0.76)
0.60
(0.41–0.78)
0.74
(0.61–0.87)
0.60
(0.42–0.78)
0.74
(0.61–0.88)
Fibrosis vs. Non-Fibrosis Linear
Regression
0.63
(0.36–0.89)
0.29
(0.00–0.60)
0.90
(0.81–0.97)
0.40
(0.00–0.83)
0.85
(0.74–0.94)