Table 2.
Criteria for assessing study quality
| Points awarded. | Method | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Study design | ||
| 3 | Prospective | Each participants is surveyed before the pandemic and during the pandemic and their dietary intake compared between time points |
| 2 | Pre/post | Separate groups of participants are surveyed either before or during the pandemic, and differences in the intake are based on group comparisons |
| 1 | Retrospective | Cross-sectional design in which participants surveyed during the pandemic are asked to recall their diet before the pandemic and/or comment on changes |
| Dietary assessment method | ||
| 7 | Objective assessment | Dietary intake is either observed by trained study staff or ascertained by a blood-based nutritional marker |
| 6 | Multiple 24-h recall | Participants are asked to recall their dietary intake for 24 h, in the presence of trained study staff, for at least one weekend day and one weekday |
| 5 | Single 24-h recall/validated FFQ | Participants are asked to recall their dietary intake for 24 h, for a single 24-h period, or participants complete a validated FFQ |
| 4 | Validated study-specific questionnaire | Participants complete a questionnaire developed for the study under question, which asks about the intake of several foods and has been validated in previous analyses |
| 3 | FFQ | Participants complete an FFQ which has not been previously validated |
| 2 | Study-specific questionnaire | Participants complete a questionnaire developed for the study under question, which asks about the intake of several foods which has not been validated in previous analyses |
| 1 | Study-specific single-item question | Participants are asked a single question about their intake (usually relating to a single food item) |
Abbreviations: FFQ food frequency questionnaire