Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 26;18(9):4572. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094572

Table 5.

The SOC-29 scores in T1 and T2 of selected groups of students (Student t-test for dependent groups or the ANOVA variance for three groups with at least five cases).

Feature SOC-29 Total Results
T1 T2
N Mean SD p N Mean SD p
Gender Female 79 133.7 20.2 0.0076 ** 79 131.3 23.3 0.0107 **
Male 31 144.0 17.5 31 143.3 25.6
Hometown Wrocław 21 140.1 17.9 0.1868 20 140.9 24.2 0.1064
Other 89 135.8 20.4 90 133.3 24.5
Financial situation Good 46 142.4 18.0 0.0063 ** 32 138.9 25.4 0.2796
Satisfactory 62 132.7 20.6 72 133.8 24.4
Bad 2 127.0 14.0 6 122.2 16.1
Paid job Never 20 132.4 20.2 0.3842 4 114.5 7.2
From time to time 67 136.4 19.6 47 127.3 22.7 0.0111 **
Often 23 140.9 20.3 59 141.9 24.3
Close person/friend Yes 101 137.2 20.1 0.1450 102 135.0 23.5 0.2811
No 9 129.8 17.9 8 133.3 36.6
Support of psychologist Yes 62 133.0 20.5 0.0162 ** 72 137.5 24.1 0.0665
No 48 141.3 18.4 38 129.7 24.8
Satisfaction with chosen field of study Yes 100 138.3 19.3 0.0028 ** 87 136.7 24.6 0.0438 *
No 10 120.0 19.8 23 129.2 23.1
Being prepared for work as a physiotherapist Yes 60 142.9 18.4 0.0001 ** 24 143.3 24.5 0.0267 *
No 50 129.1 19.3 86 132.3 24.1
Work as a physiotherapist Yes 105 137.4 19.9 0.0236 ** 102 135.7 24.4 0.0557
No 5 119.2 14.8 8 121.3 24.1
Leave the country Yes 30 133.4 17.8 0.2414 22 134.4 24.5 0.4755
No 58 136.0 20.2 88 134.5 24.5
I don’t know 22 142.7 21.0 0 0 0

SOC-29, Sense of Coherence Questionnaire; T1, Initial results; T2, Final results after two years of education; * statistical significance (p < 0.05); ** statistical significance after Bonferroni correction (p < 0.025).