Skip to main content
. 2021 May 15;39:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tacc.2021.05.001

Table 2.

Wearer comfort evaluation form, scale: 0 poor to 5 excellent. Values are median (IQR [ range]) n:14, p values are for comparisons between the three respiratory protective equipment groups.

Control Powered
respirator
full-face
respirator
FFP3
Mask
p-value
PAPR-APR/
PAPR-FFP/
APR-FFP
Mobility 5 (0 [0]) 3 (2–4 [[1], [2], [3], [4]]) 4 (2–4 [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]) 4 (2–4 [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]) 0.001
0.000
0.528
Noise 5 (0 [0]) 3 (1–3 [[1], [2], [3], [4]]) 4 (2–4 [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]) 5 (2–4 [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]) 0.000
0.000
0.264
Heat 5 (0 [0]) 4.5 (3–4 [[2], [3], [4], [5]]) 3 (1–2 [0–4]) 3 (1–2 [0–4]) 0.000
0.000
0.979
Vision 5 (0 [0]) 5 (2–4 [[1], [2], [3], [4]]) 4 (1–3 [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]) 3.5 (1–3 [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]) 0.003
0.004
0.227
Speech intelligibility 5 (0 [0]) 4 (1–4 [0–5]) 4 (2–4 [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]) 4 (2–4 [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]) 0.015
0.024
0.570