Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 12;39(4):1121–1129. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03301-0

Table 3.

General health status, comorbidity, awareness of age-related change and prostate cancer-related quality-of-life of patients at follow-up after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)

Parameter Value
SF-12 health-related QoL
 General health rating
  Excellent/very good, (n, %) 13 (27.1)
  Good (n, %) 28 (58.3)
  Poor/very poor (n, %) 5 (10.4)
 Physical component score (mean, SD) 48.3 (6.9)
 Mental component score (mean, SD) 53.1 (7.3)
 No. of patients with physical component score > 50 (%) 22 (45.8)
 No. of patients with mental component score > 50 (%) 36 (75)
 Item missing (n, %) 2 (4.2)
Charlson Comorbidity Index, % (mean, SD) 29.8 (25.3)
Measures of subjective age (mean, SD)
 AARC-10 SF gainsa 16.7 (3.3)
 AARC-10 SF lossesa 11.0 (3.3)
 Discrepancy of felt and chronological age in years − 10.4 (9.8)
 Proportional discrepancy scoreb − 0.14 (0.12)
 Item missing (n, %) 3 (6.3)
Clark’s prostate cancer-related QoL
 Health worry (mean, SD)c 42.3 (22.6)
 PSA concern (mean, SD)d 88.0 (15.1)
 Outlook (mean, SD)e 51.6 (23.2)
  Informed decision index (mean, SD)f 88.7 (17.1)
  Treatment regret index ≥ 40 (n, %)g 10 (20.8)
  Item missing (n, %) 1 (2.1)

AARC-10 SF awareness of age-related change short form, HIFU high-intensity focused ultrasound, SF-12 short form health survey, QoL quality of life

aHigher values indicate higher levels of perceived gains or losses

bHigher values indicate less discrepancy of felt and chronological age

cHigher values indicate greater worry

dHigher values indicate greater concern

eHigher values indicate better outlook

fHigher values indicate more informed decision

gValues ≥ 40 indicate regret