Table 7.

The subjective evaluation of the rehabilitation procedures reported by rugby players (n = 60).

	All the Players n = 60		French Players (F) n = 30		Polish Players (P) n = 30		p Value a
	N	% (95%CI)	N	% (95%CI)	N	% (95%CI)
Occurrence of recurrent ailments after injury
Yes	41	68.3 (56.3, 80.3)	19	63.3 (50.9, 75.7)	22	73.3 (61.9, 84.7)	0.414
No	19	31.7 (19.7, 43.7)	11	36.7 (24.3, 49.1)	8	26.7 (15.3, 38.1)	0.414
Physiological recurrent ailments after injury
Pain	25	41.7 (29.0, 54.4)	13	43.3 (30.5, 56.1)	12	40.0 (27.4, 52.6)	0.798
Discomfort	15	25.0 (13.8, 36.2)	7	23.3 (12.4, 34.2)	8	26.7 (15.3, 38.1)	0.770
Limitation of movement	11	18.3 (8.3, 28.3)	3	10.0 (2.3, 17.7)	8	26.7 (15.3, 38.1)	0.098
Contracture	9	15.0 (5.8, 24.2)	7	23.3 (12.4, 34.2)	2	6.6 (0.2, 13.0)	0.073
Causes of ineffective rehabilitation
Too quick return to the game	17	28.3 (16.7, 39.9)	6	20.0 (9.7, 30.3)	11	36.7 (24.3, 49.1)	0.157
Too short time of rehabilitation	20	33.3 (21.1, 45.5)	10	33.3 (21.1, 45.5)	10	33.3 (21.1, 45.5)	1.00
Mismanaged rehabilitation	8	13.3 (4.5, 22.1)	6	20.0 (9.7, 30.3)	2	6.6 (0.2, 13.0)	0.133
Non-compliance the physiotherapist prescriptions	3	5.0 (−0.6, 10.6)	1	3.3 (−1.3, 7.9)	2	6.6 (0.2, 13.0)	0.561

^a p value for the comparison of the number of players with recommended the specific form of rehabilitation between French and Polish players.