Skip to main content
. 2021 May 6;22(9):4937. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094937

Table 1.

Traditional and emerging protein biomarkers, considering their advantages and disadvantages. BNP, B-type or brain natriuretic peptide; cTn, cardiac troponin; Gal-3, Galactin-3; NPs, Natriuretic peptides; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; sST2, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2.

Traditional Biomarkers
Biomarkers Advantages Disadvantages Ref.
BNP, NT-proBNP − Higher values in asymptomatic individuals than healthy subjects − Influenced by age, body mass index, and other conditions (e.g., renal failure, inflammatory pulmonary disease) [10,14]
Emerging Protein Biomarkers
Biomarkers Advantages Disadvantages Ref.
cTn − Highly sensitive detection
  • Difficult definition for cut-offs

  • Influenced by age, gender, body max index, systolic pressure, diabetes mellitus

[19,20,22]
sST2
  • Higher values in asymptomatic individuals than healthy subjects

  • Low biological variation vs NPs

  • Suitable for follow-up

− Useful only in combination with other NPs [24,25]
Gal-3 − Higher in pre-symptomatic individuals
  • Low specificity

  • Useful only in combination with other NPs

[26,27]
Ghrelin − Differentiation according to HF stage − Useful only in combination with other NPs [28,29]