Table 2.
Summary comparison of facility capacity by country network versus service domains.
| Category | ** Expected Score % |
** Required Score % |
Malawi (Lighthouse PHC Sites) n = 4 Average (Range: Min-Max) |
Zambia (CHRESO PHC Sites) n = 4 Average (Range: Min-Max) |
* ZaMaC Sites N = 8 (Mean + Sample SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General measures and infrastructure score as% out of 6 | 100 | 66.7 | 81.3 (75.0–91.7) | 87.5 (58.3–100.0) | 84.38 ± 14.39 |
| Essential drugs availability score as% out 18 | 100 | 77.8 | 68.1 (66.7–72.2) | 58.3 (44.4–77.8) | 63.19 ± 11.08 |
| Basic medical equipment as% out of 18 | 100 | 66.7 | 63.9 (55.6–88.9) | 56.9 (44.4–66.7) | 60.41 ± 13.09 |
| Diagnostic capacity as% out of 26 | 100 | 65.3 | 64.4 (55.9–75.7) | 66.3 (57.7–73.1) | 65.38 ± 8.54 |
| Process and quality measures as% out of 24 | 100 | 66.7 | 40.1 (27.0–47.0) | 55.2 (43.8–72.9) | 47.66 ± 13.48 |
| Total NCD Service capacity score% | 100 | 67.9 | 59.0 (52.6–69.2) | 63.1 (50.6–73.7) | 61.06 ± 8.24 |
| HF Preparedness benchmark achieved (Yes/No) | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
* ZaMaC = Zambia–Malawi Collaboration on NCDs Project PHC sites combined; ** expected and required domain scores further detailed in Table A1.