Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 31;47(3):171–180. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3939

Table 2.

Average precarious employment score and prevalence of precarious employment, 1988–2016a [CI=confidence interval; PE= precarious employment; PES=precarious employment score; SD=standard deviation]

Characteristics N (% of sample) Average PES (SD) Prevalence of PE % (SD) b
Full sample 101 290 (100) 3.17 (1.19) 31 (0.46)
Gender
 Male c 52 572 (51.9) 3.02 (1.17) 26 (0.44)
 Female 48 718 (48.1) 3.34 (1.20) d 37 (0.48) d
Race/ethnicity
 Non-hispanic white c 52 852 (52.2) 3.14 (1.18) 30 (0.46)
 Hispanic 19 023 (18.8) 3.24 (1.23) d 34 (0.47) d
 Non-hispanic black 28 214 (27.9) 3.31 (1.23) d 36 (0.48) d
 Non-hispanic other 1201 (1.2) 3.26 (1.24) d 35 (0.48) d
Educational attainment
 Primary school c 499 (0.5) 3.99 (1.07) 60 (0.49)
 High school 50 195 (49.6) 3.43 (1.19) d 40 (0.49) d
 College 39 546 (39.0) 3.03 (1.16) d 26 (0.44) d
 Graduate 11 050 (10.9) 2.65 (1.05) d 15 (0.36) d
Wages/salary
 Below state median c 50 650 (50.0) 3.84 (1.08) 53 (0.50)
 Above state median 50 640 (50.0) 2.60 (0.97) d 12 (0.33) d
Region
 South c 40 601 (40.1) 3.23 (1.17) 32 (0.47)
 Northeast 16 112 (15.9) 3.03 (1.17) d 27 (0.44) d
 North Central 24 368 (24.1) 3.17 (1.20) d 31 (0.46) d
 West 20 209 (20.0) 3.18 (1.25) d 32 (0.47)
a

Estimates are adjusted to age 30 and are weighted using the NLSY custom weights for the whole study period (1988-2016).

b

Represents the highest tertile of precarious employment. Tertiles were generated based on the pooled sample across all years (N=101,290 observations).

c

Reference group for statistical testing. We used t-tests (average PES) and chi-squared tests (prevalence of PE) to test for differences between the reference and other group.

d

P<0.05