Table 2.
Distribution of pattern types between CUD patients, controls, and independent controls.
| CUD Patients (n = 84) | Control Group (n = 24) | Independent Control Group a (n = 52) | All Group Comparison | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern Type | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | X2 (p-value)c |
| Total | ||||
| Type I | 102 (61) | 30 (63) | 72 (69) | 2.42 (0.49) |
| Type II | 27 (16) | 7 (15) | 17 (16) | |
| Type III | 33 (20) | 7 (15) | 13 (13) | |
| Type IV | 6 (4) | 4 (8) | 2 (2) | |
| Right Hemisphere | ||||
| Type I | 59 (70) | 19 (79) | 31 (60) | 5.61 (0.13) |
| Type II | 10 (12) | 1 (4) | 10 (19) | |
| Type III | 14 (17) | 2 (8) | 9 (17) | |
| Type IV | 1 (1) | 2 (8) | 2 (4) | |
| Left Hemisphere | ||||
| Type I | 43 (51) | 11 (46) | 41 (79) | 0.50 (0.92) |
| Type II | 17 (20) | 6 (25) | 7 (14) | |
| Type III | 19 (23) | 5 (21) | 4 (8) | |
| Type IV | 5 (6) | 2 (8) | 0 (-) |
a
For reference and comparison we included the number and distribution of pattern types from an independent control sample identified from a previously published paper (Patti and Troiani 2018).
c
Comparing CUD patients n = 84, to control group n = 24, and independent control group n = 52.