Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hematol. 2020 Dec 24;96(3):282–291. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26061

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of propensity score matched patients who received 10-day decitabine with venetoclax, and intensive chemotherapy

Patient characteristics 10-day decitabine and venetoclax
(N=85)
Intensive chemotherapy
(N=85)
p
Age, years 72 [69–78] 73 [67–76] .24
 Age ≥ 70 years 63 (74) 55 (65) .18
 Age ≥ 80 years 15 (18) 10 (12) .28
Male sex 45 (53) 48 (56) .64
ECOG Performance Status
 0–1 55 (65) 58 (68) .63
 ≥2 30 (35) 27 (32)
Bone marrow blasts, % 45 [22–62] 65 [38–84] <.01
Diagnosis
 De novo AML 55 (65) 59 (69)
 Secondary AML with AHD 15 (18) 9 (11) .38
 Therapy-related AML 16 (19) 19 (22)
Prior therapies 0 (0) 0 (0) NA
ELN 2017 cytogenetic risk group
 Favorable 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Intermediate 44 (52) 33 (39) .08
 Adverse 40 (47) 52 (61)
FLT3-ITD/TKD 14 (16) 22 (24) .09
ELN 2017 risk group
 Favorable 19 (22) 14 (16)
 Intermediate 11 (13) 17 (20) .36
 Adverse 55 (65) 54 (64)
Stem-cell transplantation after response 12 (14) 7 (8) .23
Treatment-related mortality (TRM) risk
 High (TRM score >13.1) 24 (28) 24 (28) 1.00
 Low (TRM score ≤13.1) 61 (72) 61 (72)
Expected TRM rate, %, mean ± SD1 12 ± 12 14 ± 14 .27

Results reported as n (%), or median [interquartile range]. ECOG = Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group, AHD = antecedent hematological disorder, ELN = European LeukemiaNet.

1.

Expected mortality with intensive chemotherapy using the TRM model.