Appendix Table A1.

Data-based 2000–2010 indicator values for ecosystem services, human well-being domains, and composite HWBI for the four counties in the study area (Smith et al. 2014; EPA 2018).

	Escambia	Okaloosa	Santa Rosa	Walton
Ecosystem Services
Air Quality	0.31	0.72	0.29	0.90
Food, Fiber, Fuel	0.41	0.41	0.40	0.44
Greenspace	0.51	0.51	0.52	0.55
Water Quality	0.41	0.39	0.73	0.67
Water Quantity	0.40	0.48	0.41	0.38
Economic Services
Capital investment	0.59	0.59	0.58	0.58
Consumption	0.52	0.52	0.51	0.52
Employment	0.61	0.64	0.62	0.62
Finance	0.49	0.48	0.44	0.51
Innovation	0.39	0.40	0.58	0.60
Production	0.51	0.47	0.48	0.50
Re-distribution	0.40	0.42	0.35	0.49
Social Services
Activism	0.59	0.55	0.49	0.59
Communication	0.49	0.56	0.48	0.48
Community Initiatives	0.19	0.18	0.31	0.34
Education	0.44	0.41	0.39	0.46
Emergency Preparedness	0.31	0.59	0.61	0.54
Family Services	0.48	0.54	0.53	0.57
Healthcare	0.35	0.41	0.41	0.44
Justice	0.48	0.4	0.42	0.55
Labor	0.46	0.44	0.44	0.47
Public works	0.45	0.45	0.46	0.56
Human Well-Being
Connection to Nature	0.49	0.49	0.47	0.85
Cultural Fulfillment	0.51	0.49	0.49	0.36
Education	0.46	0.52	0.51	0.31
Health	0.57	0.58	0.60	0.53
Leisure Time	0.60	0.57	0.59	0.56
Living Standards	0.50	0.55	0.54	0.50
Safety and Security	0.50	0.59	0.65	0.57
Social Cohesion	0.43	0.49	0.51	0.38
Composite HWBI	0.50	0.53	0.54	0.48