Table 3.
Diagnostic performance of the four readers regarding the MIBC detection for image set 1 and image set 2
MIBC detection | Pairwise ROC curve comparison | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | AUC set 1 (95% CI) | AUC set 2 (95% CI) | p value | Pairwise readers | p value set 1 | p value set 2 | |||
Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 1 | Set 2 | |||||||
Reader 1 | 100.00 (59.04–100.00) | 100.00 (59.04–100.00) | 82.76 (64.23–94.16 | 83.33 (65.28–94.36) | 0.91 (0.77–0.98) | 0.92 (0.78–0.98) | 0.99 |
Reader 1 vs reader 2 Reader 1 vs reader 3 Reader 1 vs reader 4 Reader 2 vs reader 3 Reader 2 vs reader 4 Reader 3 vs reader 4 |
0.66 0.42 0.99 0.17 0.57 0.42 |
0.57 0.66 0.32 0.99 0.57 0.71 |
Reader 2 | 100.00 (59.04–100.00) | 100.00 (59.04–100.00) | 79.31 (60.28–92.01) | 79.31 (60.28–92.01) | 0.90 (0.75–0.97) | 0.90 (0.75–0.97) | 0.99 | |||
Reader 3 | 100.00 (59.04–100.00) | 100.00 (59.04–100.00) | 89.66 (72.65–97.81) | 79.31 (60.28–92.01) | 0.95 (0.82–0.99) | 0.90 (0.75–0.97) | 0.07 | |||
Reader 4 | 100.00 (59.04–100.00) | 100.00 (59.04–100.00) | 80.00 (61.43–92.29) | 74.19 (55.39–88.14) | 0.90 (0.76–0.97) | 0.87 (0.77–0.96) | 0.15 |