Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 19;31(6):3874–3883. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07473-6

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of the four readers regarding the MIBC detection for image set 1 and image set 2

MIBC detection Pairwise ROC curve comparison
Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) AUC set 1 (95% CI) AUC set 2 (95% CI) p value Pairwise readers p value set 1 p value set 2
Set 1 Set 2 Set 1 Set 2
Reader 1 100.00 (59.04–100.00) 100.00 (59.04–100.00) 82.76 (64.23–94.16 83.33 (65.28–94.36) 0.91 (0.77–0.98) 0.92 (0.78–0.98) 0.99

Reader 1 vs reader 2

Reader 1 vs reader 3

Reader 1 vs reader 4

Reader 2 vs reader 3

Reader 2 vs reader 4

Reader 3 vs reader 4

0.66

0.42

0.99

0.17

0.57

0.42

0.57

0.66

0.32

0.99

0.57

0.71

Reader 2 100.00 (59.04–100.00) 100.00 (59.04–100.00) 79.31 (60.28–92.01) 79.31 (60.28–92.01) 0.90 (0.75–0.97) 0.90 (0.75–0.97) 0.99
Reader 3 100.00 (59.04–100.00) 100.00 (59.04–100.00) 89.66 (72.65–97.81) 79.31 (60.28–92.01) 0.95 (0.82–0.99) 0.90 (0.75–0.97) 0.07
Reader 4 100.00 (59.04–100.00) 100.00 (59.04–100.00) 80.00 (61.43–92.29) 74.19 (55.39–88.14) 0.90 (0.76–0.97) 0.87 (0.77–0.96) 0.15