Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 3;31(6):4367–4376. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07511-3

Table 2.

Comparison of baseline characteristics between RT-lesions and VT-lesions

VT-lesions RT-lesions p value
No. of HCC lesions 72 20
Age (range) 71.7 (49–87) 65.3 (49–88) 0.03*
Gender (%)
Women 15 (20.8) 2 (10) 0.27
Men 57 (79.2) 18 (90)
Cirrhosis (%)
Yes 60 (83.3) 20 (100) < 0.001*
No 12 (16.7) 0 (0)
BCLC stage (%)
A 38 (52.8) 10 (50) 0.83
B 34 (47.2) 10 (50)
No. of HCC lesions per patient 2.7 (1–7) 1.7 (1–4) < 0.001*
Follow-up after TACE in days (SD) 268 (± 235) 171 (± 110) < 0.001*
I 1 (1.4) 0 (0)
II 10 (13.9) 0 (0)
III 2 (2.8) 0 (0)
IVa 5 (6.9) 3 (15)
IVb 4 (5.6) 0 (0)
Liver segment (%)
Left lobe 22 (30.6) 3 (15) 0.03*
V 11 (15.3) 3 (15)
VI 8 (11.1) 0 (0)
VII 13 (18.1) 1 (5)
VIII 18 (25.0) 13 (65)
Right lobe 50 (69.4) 17 (85)
Area in mm2 (SD) 1062.8 (± 2308.6) 789.9 (± 1167.2) 0.61
Long axis in mm (SD) 33.9 (± 28.6) 36.9 (± 26.9) 0.68
MPP (SD) 180.5 (± 213.6) 92.8 (± 21.6) 0.001*
Entropy (SD) 6.084 (± 0.55) 5.934 (± 0.79) 0.33
Kurtosis (SD) 3.3 (± 1.1) 3.4 (± 1.0) 0.72
Skewness (SD) − 0.1 (± 0.35) − 0.1 (± 0.4) 0.42
Uniformity (SD) 0.0184 (± 0.008) 0.0222 (± 0.015) 0.31

Statistically significant differences are marked by an asterisk

VT-lesions lesions undergoing primary TACE, RT-lesions lesions undergoing repeated TACE, SD standard deviation, TACE transcatheter arterial chemoembolization