Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 16;26(5):1457–1466. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-00956-x

Table 3.

Psychometric properties of the Yale Food Addiction Scale for children in item levels

Item # Analyses from classical test theory Analyses from item response theory
Factor loadinga Item total correlation Test–retest reliabilityb Infit MnSq Outfit MnSq Difficulty Discrimination DIF contrast across genderc,d DIF contrast across weight statusc,e
#1 0.41 0.49 0.73 1.03 0.88 − 0.11 1.17 − 0.17 0.31
#2 0.53 0.50 0.78 0.88 0.73 − 0.16 1.14 0.21 0.49
#3 0.51 0.46 0.74 0.95 0.96 − 0.75 0.96 0.01 0.33
#4 0.44 0.42 0.83 1.12 1.04 − 0.30 0.89 0.24 0.12
#5 0.43 0.45 0.84 0.94 0.85 − 1.52 0.87 0.43 0.24
#6 0.53 0.52 0.88 0.96 0.59 0.57 1.00 − 0.23 0.33
#7 0.63 0.46 0.92 1.08 1.29 − 0.63 0.81 0.27 − 0.30
#8 0.69 0.60 0.76 0.89 0.74 − 0.30 1.08 0.19 − 0.22
#9 0.70 0.64 0.80 0.75 0.58 0.93 1.13 0.44 0.21
#10 0.51 0.54 0.86 0.96 0.68 − 0.35 1.03 0.16 0.45
#11 0.55 0.54 0.94 0.96 0.82 − 0.12 1.01 0.43 0.49
#12 0.69 0.58 0.88 0.85 0.52 0.82 1.09 − 0.47 0.23
#13 0.70 0.57 0.72 0.92 0.70 0.15 1.05 − 0.27 0.41
#14 0.68 0.59 0.70 0.91 0.64 − 0.08 1.17 − 0.39 − 0.22
#15 0.66 0.60 0.76 0.89 0.58 − 0.15 1.08 0.34 − 0.43
#16 0.64 0.57 0.72 0.88 0.65 0.84 1.03 0.09 − 0.14
#17 0.49 0.41 0.82 1.10 1.55 1.35 1.17 0.41 − 0.42
#18 0.46 0.40 0.75 1.09 1.02 1.39 1.19 0.01 − 0.34
#21 0.40 0.40 0.73 1.26 1.49 − 2.90 1.15 0.43 − 0.39
#22 0.41 0.42 0.79 1.16 1.47 − 3.02 1.34 0.21 − 0.46
#23 0.44 0.48 0.82 1.20 1.17 0.19 1.31 − 0.24 − 0.17
#25 0.57 0.41 0.77 1.24 1.33 − 1.01 0.35 − 0.41 0.38

MnSq mean square error, DIF differential item functioning

aBased on confirmatory factor analysis

bUsing intraclass correlation coefficient

cDIF contrast > 0.5 indicates substantial DIF

dDIF contrast across gender = difficulty for females − difficulty for males

eDIF contrast across weight status = difficulty for participants with obesity − difficulty for participants with overweight