. 2021 May 17;11:10386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89737-9

Table 2.

Interaction effect of the CA-based CEP and nutrient management on the system productivity (± S.D.) in terms of MGEY during the 7 years of the study in the maize–chickpea rotation.

Treatment	Maize grain equivalent yield (MGEY, Mg ha⁻¹)
Treatment	2013–2014	2014–2015	2015–2016	2016–2017	2017–2018	2018–2019	2019–2020
ZTFB–FFP	6.35^cde ± 0.31	5.39^c ± 0.12	3.79^d ± 0.66	6.33^bcde ± 1.18	9.18^cd ± 1.23	9.5^b ± 0.52	8.51^c ± 0.45
ZTFB–RDF	6.76^cd ± 0.15	6.26^abc ± 0.69	5.48^abc ± 0.36	7.84^ab ± 0.80	11.5^ab ± 1.54	10.9^a ± 0.40	11.2^bc ± 0.88
ZTFB–NE	7.54^bc ± 0.37	6.82^ab ± 1.10	6.08^ab ± 0.60	8.83^a ± 0.85	12.3^a ± 0.69	11.1^a ± 0.41	14.4^a ± 4.59
PNB–FFP	5.82^de ± 0.07	5.49^bc ± 0.30	4.56^bcd ± 0.71	5.79^de ± 1.02	10.4^bc ± 1.21	10.9^a ± 0.77	10.1^bc ± 0.84
PNB–RDF	9.07^ab ± 0.12	6.63^abc ± 0.67	6.72^a ± 0.87	6.93^bcd ± 1.67	11.8^ab ± 1.26	11.3^a ± 0.43	11.1^bc ± 0.51
PNB–NE	9.54^a ± 0.77	7.48^a ± 0.34	6.79^a ± 0.70	7.81^abc ± 0.91	11.5^ab ± 1.27	11.6^a ± 0.72	12.3^ab ± 0.40
CT–FFP	4.96^e ± 0.96	5.77^bc ± 1.64	4.48^cd ± 0.84	5.13^e ± 0.61	9.12^cd ± 1.43	7.87^c ± 0.29	9.16^c ± 0.5
CT–RDF	7.93^abc ± 0.75	6.01^bc ± 0.13	5.81^abc ± 1.07	6.11^cde ± 0.70	9.64^cd ± 1.23	8.27^c ± 0.09	8.73^c ± 1.07
CT–NE	7.48^bc ± 0.19	6.29^abc ± 0.29	5.82^abc ± 0.68	6.84^bcde ± 0.49	8.34^d ± 0.81	7.89^c ± 0.37	9.16^c ± 0.49

Means followed by a similar uppercase letter within a column is not significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Tukey’s HSD test.