Skip to main content
. 2021 May 17;11:10418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89853-6

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Viability, size and number recovered using the proposed islet cryopreservation protocol. (a) Post-thaw viability of pancreatic islets cryopreserved with proposed DMSO + trehalose protocol with varying trehalose pre-incubation time (1–48 h). Viability measured immediately post-thaw (light blue bars) and 24 h post-thaw (dark blue bars) shown. Bars represent mean ± SD, n = 3 islet isolations, repeated measures two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test, all groups were significantly different from trehalose only (Treh), other significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) are marked by asterisks. (b) Post-thaw viability of individual islets from the experiments shown in (a) measured immediately post-thaw and (c) 24 h post-thaw. Triangles represent individual islet viabilities; triangles of same colour represent results from the same experiment. (d) Distribution of islets from (a) in three viability groups for DMSO- and DT6h-cryopreserved islets immediately post-thaw and (e) 24 h post-thaw. (f) Post-thaw islet yield for islets cryopreserved with DMSO or DT6h, calculated as number of islets recovered after thawing/number of islets before freezing. (g) Average islet diameter of DMSO- and DT6h-cryopreserved islets measured pre-freeze, 0 h post-thaw and 24 h post-thaw. All figures were produced using GraphPad Prism (version 8.4.1, https://www.graphpad.com). DT6h DMSO + trehalose pre-incubated for 6 h, Treh trehalose only.