Table 3.
Dog no. | Feeding rate (%) | Promastigote detection (%) | Promastigote burden (score)* | Potential transmissibility rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 90.7 | 58.3 | 3 | 52.8 |
2 | 84.9 | 69.1 | 3 | 59.6 |
3 | 84.4 | 25.5 | 2 | 19.6 |
4 | 82.3 | 17.5 | 2 | 7.5 |
5 | 78.0 | 70.0 | 3 | 60.0 |
6 | 75.7 | 72.7 | 2 | 63.6 |
7 | 72.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8 | 63.6 | 39.3 | 2 | 30.3 |
9 | 61.9 | 78.9 | 2 | 50.0 |
10 | 54.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11 | 44.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
12 | 39.3 | 50.0 | 2 | 36.4 |
13 | 36.5 | 40.7 | 2 | 27.8 |
14 | 24.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15 | 21.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 | 14.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
17 | 14.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Promastigote burden was calculated as the parasitic score average for each sand fly.