Table 4.
Technique | Measurement of cellulite severity | Used in clinical practice? | Used in research? | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
2D/3D photography20-23,25,28,30,49 | Measures: • Waviness of skin surface • Dimple depression and elevation |
2D photography is primarily used to document cellulite severity 3D photography is used where available |
Yes | • Photographic assessment is the only validated method of measuring cellulite severity, and the use of photonumeric scales is recommended by the FDA for the evaluation of new treatments • Standardized camera settings, lighting conditions, and patient positioning are important for reproducibility • In research studies, evaluators should ideally be blinded and independent |
Ultrasonography12,13,34,35 | Provides direct visualization of the epidermis and dermal thickness | Very little clinical use Used in research to show fat herniation into the dermis |
Yes | • Operator technique is important for image quality • Dermis–hypodermis and dermis– subcutaneous length correlate with cellulite severity |
Thermographic techniques6,39,53 | Uses measurements of skin temperature to grade cellulite severity | No | Yes | • Considered subjective because skin temperature can be affected by multiple factors, including sun exposure, fever, smoking, and menstrual cycle phase in women • Can be combined with less subjective and more quantitative techniques (eg, photonumeric scales) • Cellulite must be accompanied by edema for adequate assessment |
MRI10,11,13 | Used to visualize skin architecture of the dermis and hypodermis | No | Yes | • Primarily used in research setting |
Computed axial tomography41,54 | Used to assess adipose tissue thickness | No | Yes | • Primarily used in research setting • Good correlation with MRI results |
2D, 2-dimensional; 3D, 3-dimensional; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.