Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 24;3(2):e477–e484. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.11.002

Table 1.

Demographics for Osteochondral Defect Patients Treated With BMAC and CDM

Demographics of the Patients, N = 14 n (%)
Sex
 Female 6 (42.9)
 Male 8 (57.1)
Age, y 34 (16-58)
Number of comorbidities
 0 7 (50)
 1 3 (21.4)
 2 4 (28.6)
BMI 27.7 (21.8-37.2)
Size of lesion, cm2 1.8 (.7 – 3.0)
Location of lesion
 Patella 5 (35.7)
 Lateral femoral condyle 5 (35.7)
 Medial femoral condyle 4 (28.6)
 Trochlea 2 (14.2)
Concomitant procedures
 Loose body removal 5 (35.7)
 Revision ACL reconstruction 2 (14.2)
 Distal femoral osteotomy 1 (7.1)
 Revision MPFL reconstruction 1 (7.1)
 Lateral release 3 (21.9)
 Partial meniscectomy 4 (28.6)
 Plica excision 2 (14.2)
 Tibial tubercle osteotomy 1 (7.1)
 Chondroplasty 2 (14.2)
 Subchondroplasty 3 (21.9)
Follow-up, mo 19 (12-31)

NOTE. Values are given as the mean and range in parentheses.

ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; BMAC, bone marrow aspirate concentrate; BMI, body mass index; CDM, cartilage-derived matrix; LFC, lateral femoral condyle; MPFL, medial patellofemoral ligament; PROM, patient-reported outcome measures.