Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 24;3(2):e477–e484. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.11.002

Table 2.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Osteochondral Defect Patients Treated With BMAC and CDM

Demographics of the Patients, N = 14 N (%) P Value
Physical examination findings
 Preoperative flexion,° 123.9 (3.6)
 Postoperative flexion,° 131.5 (6.3) .002
 Effect size 1.06
 Hamstring
 Preoperative strength
 4– 3 (33.3)
 4 5 (55.6)
 5 1 (11.1)
 Postoperative strength
 4 5 (45.5)
 5 6 (54.5)
 Preoperative strength 4.1 (0.35)
 Postoperative strength 4.6 (0.52) .33
 Effect size 0.94
 Quadriceps
 Preoperative strength
 3+ 2 (15.4)
 4– 5 (38.5)
 4 5 (38.5)
 5 1 (7.7)
 Postoperative strength
 4 7 (53.8)
 5 6(46.2)
 Preoperative strength 4.0 (0.43)
 Postoperative strength 4.5 (0.52) .007
 Effect size 0.96
Pain scores
 Preoperative VAS 4.5 (2.4)
 Postoperative VAS 1.4 (1.6) .001
 Effect size 1.32
Functional outcomes
 Preoperative UCLA 5.7 (2.4)
 Postoperative UCLA 6.6 (2.5) .455
 Effect size 0.23
 Preoperative KOS-ADL 53.8 (14.3)
 Postoperative KOS-ADL 92.9 (12.4) .007
 Effect size 6.76
 Preoperative KOS-Sports 28.2 (15.7) .560
 Postoperative KOS-Sports 79.5 (20.3)
 Effect size 1.51

NOTE. Values are given as the mean and standard deviation in parentheses.

ADL, activities of daily living; BMAC, bone marrow aspirate concentrate; CDM, cartilage-derived matrix; KOS, Knee Outcome Survey; UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles Activity Score; VAS, visual analog scale.

Strength is based on a grading scale of 0-5.