Table 5:

Results of the Randomized Controlled Trial by Richter et al²⁹ Reporting Satisfaction With Treatment in Patients With Stress Urinary Incontinence Treated With a Pessary or Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy^a

Comparison	Satisfaction	Results
Pessary (n = 146) PFMT (n = 149)	Satisfaction with treatment (PSQ) (3 mo)	Pessary: 94/146 PFMT: 110/149, RR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.02)
	Satisfaction with treatment (PSQ) (12 mo)	Pessary: 75/46 PFMT: 79/149, RR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.21)
Pessary (n = 146) Pessary + PFMT (n = 150)	Satisfaction with treatment (PSQ) (3 mo)	Pessary: 94/146 Pessary + PFMT: 118/150, RR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.95)
	Satisfaction with treatment (PSQ) (12 mo)	Pessary: 75/146 Pessary + PFMT: 81/150, RR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.18)
Pessary + PFMT (n = 150) PFMT (n = 146)	Satisfaction with treatment (PSQ) (3 mo)	Pessary + PFMT: 118/150 PFMT: 110/146, RR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.23)
	Satisfaction with treatment (PSQ) (12 mo)	Pessary + PFMT: 81/150 PFMT: 79/146, RR = 1.15 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.44)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; PFMT, pelvic floor muscle training; PSQ, patient satisfaction questionnaire; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, risk ratio.

^aThe RCT by Richter et al²⁹ was included in the systematic review by Lipp et al.¹²