Table A1:
Risk of Biasa Among Systematic Reviews (ROBIS Tool)
| Author, Year | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Eligibility Criteria | Identification and Selection of Studies | Data Collection and Study Appraisal | Synthesis and Findings | Risk of Bias in Review | |
| Lepping et al, 201442 | Low | High | High | High | High |
| Leggett et al, 201540 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Zhang et al, 201543 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Health Quality Ontario, 201618 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Nordenskjold et al, 201644 | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low |
| Berlim et al, 201745 | Low | Low | High | Low | Low |
| Brunoni et al, 201746 | High | Low | Low | High | High |
| University of Calgary, 201734 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Mutz et al, 201835 | Low | High | Low | Low | Low |
| Sehatzadeh et al, 201941 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Abbreviation: ROBIS, Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews.
a
Possible risk of bias levels: low, high, unclear.