Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 8;15(3):476–485. doi: 10.5009/gnl20238

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics: Success versus Failure (C-ETGBD)

Characteristics 2008–2020 (n=101) Success (n=73) Failure (n=28) p-value
Age, yr 77 (40–96) 76 (40–96) 79 (59–94) 0.126
Sex, M/F 64/37 45/28 19/9 0.562
Cholecystitis 0.118
Mild 63 (62.4) 50 (68.5) 13 (46.4)
Moderate 27 (26.7) 16 (21.9) 11 (39.3)
Severe 11 (10.9) 7 (9.6) 4 (14.3)
WBC, ×103/µL 11.5±5.50 11.3±4.92 12.1±7.02 0.538
CRP, mg/dL 11.6±7.91 11.5±7.91 12.8±8.17 0.482
GB stone 76 (75.2) 54 (74.0) 22 (78.6) 0.632
Background to challenge ETGBD
Comorbidity with CBD stone 58 (57.4) 42 (57.5) 16 (57.1) 0.972
Antithrombotic agents 20 (19.8) 14 (19.2) 6 (21.4) 0.799
Comorbidity with suspected GB cancer 13 (12.9) 11 (15.1) 2 (7.1) 0.287
Dementia 20 (19.8) 11 (15.1) 9 (32.1) 0.064
Ascites 12 (11.9) 8 (11.0) 4 (14.3) 0.644
Papilla 0.421
Naïve 64 (63.4) 48 (65.8) 16 (57.1)
Post-EST 37 (36.6) 25 (34.2) 12 (42.9)

Data are presented as median (range), number (%), or mean±SD.

ETGBD, endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage; C-ETGBD, conventional ETGBD; M, male; F, female; WBC, white blood cell; CRP, C-reactive protein; GB, gallbladder; CBD, common bile duct; EST, endoscopic sphincterotomy.