. 2020 Aug 26;15(3):391–400. doi: 10.5009/gnl20140

Table 4.

Preferred Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Pedunculated Polyps: Results of the Scenario-Based Survey

Condition	Techniques	Overall (n=154)	Indonesia (n=16)	Korea (n=47)	Malaysia (n=15)	Mongolia (n=24)	Myanmar (n=7)	Thailand (n=40)	Vietnam (n=5)
Pedunculated polyps with head size <20 mm and stalk width <10 mm	CSP	11 (7.1)	1 (6.3)	0	1 (6.7)	7 (29.2)	0	2 (5.0)	0
	HSP	100 (64.9)^*	13 (81.3)^*	15 (31.9)	13 (86.7)^*	13 (54.2)^*	6 (85.7)^*	35 (87.5)^*	5 (100)^*
	EMR	40 (26.0)	2 (12.5)	32 (68.1)^*	1 (6.7)	2 (8.3)	1 (14.3)	2 (5.0)	0
	ESD	3 (1.9)	0	0	0	2 (8.3)	0	1 (2.5)	0
Prophylactic hemostasis	Clipping	91 (59.1)^*	12 (75.0)^*	15 (31.9)	5 (33.3)	21 (87.5)^*	5 (71.4)^*	30 (75.0)^*	3 (60.0)^*
	Detachable snare	10 (6.5)	1 (6.3)	2 (4.3)	1 (6.7)	3 (12.5)	1 (14.3)	1 (2.5)	1 (20.0)
	None	53 (34.4)	3 (18.8)	30 (63.8)^*	9 (60.0)^*	0	1 (14.3)	9 (22.5)	1 (20.0)
Pedunculated polyps with head size ≥20 mm or stalk width ≥10 mm	CSP	1 (0.6)	0	0	0	0	1 (14.3)	0	0
	HSP	90 (58.4)^*	12 (75.0)^*	12 (25.5)	13 (86.7)^*	11 (45.8)^*	6 (85.7)^*	32 (80.0)^*	4 (80.0)^*
	EMR	58 (37.7)	4 (25.0)	34 (72.3)^*	2 (13.3)	11 (45.8)^*	0	6 (15.0)	1 (20.0)
	ESD	3 (1.9)	0	1 (2.1)	0	2 (8.3)	0	0	0
	Others^†	2 (1.3)	0	0	0	0	0	2 (5.0)	0
Prophylactic hemostasis	Clipping	87 (56.5)^*	7 (43.8)^*	20 (42.6)^*	7 (46.7)^*	20 (83.3)^*	4 (57.1)^*	28 (70.0)^*	1 (20.0)
	Detachable snare	51 (33.1)	7 (43.8)^*	19 (40.4)	4 (26.7)	4 (16.7)	3 (42.9)	11 (27.5)	3 (60.0)^*
	None	16 (10.4)	2 (12.5)	8 (17.0)	4 (26.7)	0	0	1 (2.5)	1 (20.0)

Values are presented as number (%).

CSP, cold snare polypectomy; HSP, hot snare polypectomy; EMR, endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.

*The most preferred method for each condition; †Others indicates referring the case to specialist endoscopists.