Skip to main content
. 2021 May 18;2021(5):CD007579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007579.pub3

Summary of findings 7. Opioid antagonists compared to placebo for preventing nausea and vomiting.

Opioid antagonists compared to placebo for preventing nausea and vomiting
Patient or population: preventing nausea and vomiting
Setting: in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section
Intervention: opioid antagonists
Comparison: placebo
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) № of participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Risk with placebo Risk with opioid antagonists
Nausea ‐ intraoperative Study population (0 studies)  
see comment see comment
Vomiting ‐ intraoperative Study population (0 study)  
see comment see comment
Nausea ‐ postoperative Study population RR 0.75
(0.39 to 1.45) 120
(1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1  
267 per 1000 200 per 1000
(104 to 387)
Vomiting ‐ postoperative Study population RR 1.25
(0.35 to 4.43) 120
(1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 2  
67 per 1000 83 per 1000
(23 to 295)
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1 Downgrade 2 for imprecision. Only 28 events out of 120 women in one study. Wide CI crossing line of no difference.

2 Downgrade 2 for imprecision. Only 9 events out of 120 women in one study. Wide CI crossing line of no difference.