Skip to main content
. 2021 May 18;2021(5):CD007579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007579.pub3

Direkvand‐Moghadam 2013.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Participants
  • Women, ASA 1 or 2, undergoing elective CD under spinal allocated to one of 3 groups.

  • N = 102

Interventions Intervention 1: dopamine antagonist (Comparison 2)
  • Metoclopramide ‐ 15 mg.

  • N = 34


Intervention 2: acupuncture/acupressure (Comparison 8)
  • P6 acupressure

  • N = 34


Comparison: placebo (no intervention)
  • N = 34

Outcomes Incidence of nausea and vomiting intra‐op, then 30, 60, 90, 120, 240 and 360 min after surgery
Notes Setting: Mustafa University Hospital of Ilam, West Iran.
Dates: Septemebr 2011 to October 2012.
Funding source: Ilam University of Medical Sciences.
Declaration of interest: not reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote:"random number table"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation undertaken by midwife prior to anaesthesia
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Patient aware of which allocation group patient was in
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote:"researcher not aware of grouping of patients"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No data missing
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Not described
Other bias Low risk Nil apparent