Liu 2015a.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | Women elective CS under regional anaesthesia N = 90 |
|
Interventions | Intervention: acupoint electrostimulation
Comparator 1: sham stimulation
Comparator 2: placebo
|
|
Outcomes | Haemodynamics, VAS nausea score, plasma 5‐HT concentrations. Bleeding, administration of oxytocin, ephedrine and atropine |
|
Notes | Setting: not stated but authors from Qingdao Regional Hospital, Shandong Province, China Dates: not reported Funding source: not reported Declaration of interest: not reported. Chinese paper with English abstract. No data for this review in the abstract. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Sites covered with sticking plaster, but unclear if participants aware |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear from abstract |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear from abstract |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Unclear from abstract |