Modir 2019.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | Women having elective CS under spinal anaesthesia N = 140 |
|
Interventions | Intervention 1: corticosteroid (Comparison 3)
Intervention 2: sedative (Comparison 6)
Intervention 3: (Comparison 6)
Comparator: placebo
|
|
Outcomes | Nausea and vomiting | |
Notes | Setting: Valiasr Hospital, Arak, Iran, presumably, but not stated specifically Dates: not reported Funding source: Arak University of Medical Sciences Declaration of interest: not reported. No data for the review as it is unclear how many women in each group |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Block random allocation method used but no further details provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Although described as double blind ‐ no discussion of blinding participants or personnel |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: “… second project executive, who was unaware of the grouping assignment, recorded the data.” |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear how many women provided data in each group |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | The same outcomes in the methods are reported in the results but we did not assess the trial protocol |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Women were excluded (presumably after randomisation) if they were vomiting intra‐op or if dissatisfied – unclear why these women were to be excluded. |