Rudra 2004a.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | 60 ASA 1‐2 women scheduled for CS with spinal anaesthesia, no GI/liver/ear disease, hyperemesis, hyperlipidaemia, antiemetics within 24 hours. | |
Interventions | Intervention: sedative (Comparison 6)
Comparison: placebo
|
|
Outcomes | Nausea, retching, vomiting, rescue antiemetics. | |
Notes | Setting: Calcutta National Medical College, Kolkata, India. Dates: not reported. Funding source: not reported. Declaration of interest: not reported. Retching data combined with vomiting. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated randomisation. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Treating anaesthetist not blinded. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | We did not assess the trial protocol. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No major differences in baseline characteristics. |