Wu 2007.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Individual RCT | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria: |
|
Interventions | Group 1: steroid (Comparison 3)
Group 2: dopamine antagonist (Comparison 2)
Group 3: steroid + Dopamine antagonist ‐ data nor used in this review
Group 4: Comparison: placebo
|
|
Outcomes | Composite outcome of nausea and vomiting | |
Notes | Setting: Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Dates: not reported. Funding source: not reported. Declaration of interest: not reported. Only useable data are postoperative vomiting. Other outcomes are amalgamated in composite score. We have written to the authors and attempt to get separated data. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "computer generated random numbers." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Medications made up by uninvolved anaesthetist blinded to treatment |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Observers blinded to allocations. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No loss to follow‐up, ITT analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | We did not assess the trial protocol. |
Other bias | Low risk | No baseline imbalance. |