Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 18;17(3):714–723. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.86709

Table III.

Relationship between positive patch test reactions to PPDA and occupational work

Occupation, N = 128 RR, n (%) PR, n (%) NR, n (%)
Office worker, N = 24 1 (4.0) 0 23 (96.0)
Farmer, N = 16 13 (81.0) 0 3 (19.0)
Hairdresser, N = 8 7 (88.0) 1 (12.0) 0
Health care employee, N = 9 1 (11.0) 2 (22.0) 6 (67.0)
Occupational contact with ink, N = 9 4 (44.0) 2 (22.0) 3 (33.0)
Mechanic, N = 3 2 (67.0) 1 (33.0) 0
Food service worker, N = 4 2 (50.0) 0 2 (50.0)
Construction worker, N = 8 5 (62.5) 1 (12.5) 2 (25.0)
Student, N = 12 0 0 12 (100)
Housewife, N = 7 0 0 7 (100)
Seller, N = 6 2 (33.0) 1 (17.0) 3 (50.0)
Retiree, N = 4 1 (25.0) 0 3 (75.0)
Cleaner, N = 3 2 (67.0) 1 (33.0) 0
Occupational contact with textiles, N = 3 0 1 (33.0) 2 (67.0)
Policeman, N = 2 1 (50.0) 0 1 (50.0)
Computer scientist, N = 2 1 (50.0) 1 (50.0) 0
Others*, N = 8 5 (62.5) 1 (12.5) 2 (25)
*

These include: drainage engineer, customs officer, missionary, beauty salon worker, cashier, worker operating the injection molding machine, municipal sanitation worker, carpenter, N – number of individuals allergic to PPDA, NR – no relation to occupational work, PR – probable relation to occupational work, RR – reliable relation to occupational work.