Skip to main content
. 2021 May 18;77:244–249. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.05.016

Table 3.

Chest CT imaging findings of COVID-19 patients who had diagnostic CTPA to assess the presence of pulmonary embolism, and comparison between PE group and non-PE group.

PE No-PE Overall patients p
GGO 24/24, 100% 55/60, 92% 78/84, 93% 0,5
Consolidation 19/24, 79% 50/60, 83% 69/84, 82% 0,15
GGO (lobes involved) 3,83 ± 1,30 2,75 ± 1,65 3,07 ± 1,62 0,019*
Consolidation (lobes involved) 2,67 ± 1,82 1,93 ± 1,53 2,14 ± 1,65 0,01*
Mixed GGO and consolidation 19/24, 79% 47/60, 78% 66/84, 78% 0,2
Nodes involvement 6/24, 25% 28/60, 46% 34/84, 40% 0,69
Crazy paving 9/24, 37% 11/60, 18% 20/84, 24% 0,19
Reversed halo sign 1/24, 0,4% 1/60, 0,2% 2/84, 0,2% 0,5

GGO: ground-glass opacities; PE: pulmonary embolism.

Mean ± DS. Data are n (%).