Table 5. NMP as mean of items.
| Prevalence as mean of items (oldest to newest study) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gezgin et al. (2017a) | NMP-Q | 3.96 |
| Gentina et al. (2018) | NMP-Q | 3.53 ±.92 |
| Gezgin et al. (2018a) | NMP-Q | 3.61 ±1.38 |
| Tams et al. 2018) | NMP-Q | 2.95 ±1.26 |
| Daei et al. (2019) | NMP-Q | 3.1 ±.72 |
| Kara et al. (2019) | NMP-Q | 3.10 ±.92 |
| Aktay & Hanife (2019) | NMP-Q | 4.19 ± 1.28 |
| Fitz et al. (2019) | NMP-Q | 4.74 ± 1.68 |
| Adnan & Gezgin (2016) | NMP-Q | 4.07 |
| Salwa (2017) | NMP-Q | 3.2 ±.97 |
| Gezgin et al. (2018c) | NMP-Q | 3.73 |
Note:
* They appear both in Tables 5 and 6 because they reported both the mean and severity levels.
** According to the authors, High and Low NMP Groups corresponds to the top 25 percent and bottom 25 percent, respectively.