Domac 2015.

Study characteristics
Methods	Parallel RCT Approved by the ethics committee and informed consents obtained Site: Samsun, Turkey Data collection: no information Funding: departmental Registration: no information
Participants	40 ASA I to III participants undergoing hip fracture repair under spinal anaesthesia Excluded: < 65 years of age or > 80 years of age, peripheral neurological disease, mental disorder, allergy to amide local anaesthetics, coagulation/haemostasis disease, moderate or severe liver or kidney failure, contraindication to or refusing fascia iliaca block Type of fracture: hip fracture Anaesthetic technique for surgery: spinal block Surgical technique: not mentioned Mean age: 70.5 years (range 65 to 80) Percentage female: 62.5% Length of follow‐up: 48 hours
Interventions	Intevention: fascia iliaca block (N = 20) Comparator: no nerve block (N = 20)
Outcomes	Relevant to this review. Pain. Opioid requirements. Participant satisfaction. Not relevant to this review. Quality of positioning for spinal block. Onset of spinal block. Duration of analgesia. Opioid side effects. Haemodynamic variables. Cognitive function. Haemodynamic variables.
Notes	Conflict of interest: "authors do not report any conflict of interest" DOI: n/a SDs of 0.00 entered as 0.001 Email sent on 5 January 2020 Sources obtained for risk of bias assessment. Journal article with results of the trial.