Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 25;2020(11):CD001159. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001159.pub3

Luger 2012.

Study characteristics
Methods Parallel RCT
Approved by the ethics committee and written informed consents obtained
Site: Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
Data collection: no information
Funding: "the manuscript was solely supported by institutional and private resources"
Registration: no information
Participants 34 ASA I to III very elderly participants (> 80 years) with hip fracture (of whom 3 with dementia had to be excluded) scheduled for surgery under spinal anaesthesia
Excluded: patients with score < 18 on the Mini‐Mental State Examination, whose surgery did not take place within 36 hours, with known intolerance or allergies to drugs, planned or required general anaesthesia, refusal of consent, participation in a different study, administration of midazolam as premedication, chronic pain, contraindications and spinal anaesthesia failure, incomplete data records
Type of fracture: pertrochanteric femur fracture (45%) or medial femur neck fracture (55%)
Anaesthetic technique for surgery: spinal block
Surgical technique: hemi‐arthroplasty (35%), total hip replacement (10%), dynamic hip screw (30%), cannulated screws (5%) or proximal femoral nail (20%)
Mean age: 89 years (range not mentioned)
Percentage female: 95%
Length of follow‐up: in hospital
Interventions Intervention: continuous femoral (3‐in‐1) nerve block (N = 10)
Comparator: no nerve block (N = 10)
Outcomes Relevant to this review.
  1. Pain.

  2. Myocardial ischaemia (number of participants with positive outcome).

  3. Opioids.


Not relevant to this review.
  1. Cognition.

  2. Hospital length of stay.

Notes Conflict of interest: "the author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article"
DOI: 10.1177/2151458512470953
Study also includes a group with epidural analgesia (N = 14) ‐ not retained in this review
Email sent on 5 January 2020