Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 25;2020(11):CD001159. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001159.pub3

Madabushi 2016.

Study characteristics
Methods Parallel RCT
Approved by the ethics committee and informed consents obtained
Site: MS Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, Bangalore, India
Data collection: no information
Funding: departmental/institutional
Registration: no information
Participants 60 ASA status I to III participants undergoing surgery for all types of femoral neck fractures
Excluded: patients with bleeding diathesis and neuropsychiatric complaints, those on previous opioid therapy or with polytrauma
Type of fracture: intertrochanteric or neck fracture
Anaesthetic technique for surgery: spinal block
Surgical technique: not mentioned
Mean age: 59.6 years (range 25 to 75)
Percentage female: 47%
Length of follow‐up: 24 hours
Interventions Intervention: fascia iliaca block (N = 30)
Comparator: no nerve block (N = 30)
Outcomes Relevant to this review.
  1. Pain during positioning for spinal anaesthesia.

  2. Opioid requirements (number of participants who required rescue analgesia; not retained for this review).

  3. Complications.


Not relevant to this review.
  1. Quality of positioning.

  2. Haemodynamic variables.

  3. Time required for performance of spinal anaesthetic technique 

Notes Conflict of interest: none
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.09.014
Email sent on 5 January 2020