Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 25;2020(11):CD001159. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001159.pub3

Tuncer 2003.

Study characteristics
Methods Parallel RCT
Approved by the ethics committee and informed consents obtained
Site: Konya, Turkey
Funding: no information
Registration: no information
Participants 40 ASA I to II participants with hip fracture, undergoing surgery for trochanteric hip fracture
Excluded: coagulation abnormality, age < 18 or > 80 years, weight < 50 or > 100 kg, known allergy to bupivacaine or opioids, previous analgesic treatment with opioids, inability to understand pain scales or use a patient‐controlled analgesia device
Type of fracture: trochanteric femur fracture
Anaesthetic technique for surgery: general anaesthesia
Surgical technique: trochanteric fracture repair
Mean age: 59 years (range not stated)
Percentage female: not stated
Length of follow‐up: in‐hospital
Interventions Intervention: continuous femoral (3‐in‐1) nerve block (N = 20)
Comparator: no nerve block (N = 20)
Outcomes Relevant to this review.
  1. Pain.

  2. Participant satisfaction (ascending scale from 1 to 4).


Not relevant to this review.
  1. Opioid side effects.

  2. Time to first walk.


Participant satisfaction (rated as excellent, good, moderate, or poor; we assigned scores from 1 to 4 to compare data)
Notes Conflict of interest: no information
DOI: 10.1016/S1366‐0071(03)00004‐4
Email sent to study authors on 24 May 2015, to ask for additional information; no reply