Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 25;2020(11):CD001159. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001159.pub3

Yamamoto 2016.

Study characteristics
Methods Parallel RCT
Approved by the ethics committee and informed consent obtained
Site: Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
Data collection: October 2016 to January 2018
Funding: departmental/institutional
Registration: JPRN‐UMIN0 0 0 024147
Participants 53 ASA I or II participants over 50 years of age with acute proximal hip fracture
Excluded: poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, defined as haemoglobin A1c level > 7.0%; neurological disease; history of allergy to study drugs; serious systemic comorbidity; bleeding disorder; previous surgery in affected hip; regular opioid therapy; infection at injection site; open fracture; multiple injuries requiring pain medications or other surgeries; impaired cognition or dementia; delirium at admission
Type of fracture: femoral neck (39.6%) or pertrochanteric (60.4%) femur fracture
Anaesthetic technique for surgery: spinal block
Surgical technique: internal fixation (84.9%) or bipolar hemi‐arthroplasty (15.1%)
Mean age: 84.6 (range not stated)
Percentage female: 84.9%
Length of follow‐up: 7 days
Interventions Intervention: fascia iliaca compartment block (N = 25)
Comparator: no nerve block (N = 28)
Outcomes Relevant to this review.
  1. Pain.

  2. Acute confusional state.

  3. Time to first mobilization after surgery.

  4. Complications.


Not relevant to this review.
  1. Rescue analgesia.

Notes Conflict of interest: "there are no conflicts of interest to declare"
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.008
Email sent on 5 January 2020
Sources obtained for risk of bias assessment.
  1. Journal article with results of the trial.

  2. Non‐commercial trial registry record.