| Study |
Bias |
| Randomisation process |
Deviations from intended interventions |
Missing outcome data |
Measurement of the outcome |
Selection of the reported results |
Overall |
| Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
| Kullenberg 2004 |
Low risk of bias |
Randomized using the envelope method. No baseline differences between intervention groups identified. |
Low risk of bias |
No deviations from intended interventions identified. |
Low risk of bias |
100% of included participants were analyzed. |
Low risk of bias |
Time to first support of body weight next to the bed in hours after surgery. |
Low risk of bias |
No deviation to the planned statistical analysis identified. Only one result provided. |
Low risk of bias |
No risk of bias identified. |
| Segado Jimenez 2009 |
Low risk of bias |
Patients were randomized. No baseline differences between intervention groups identified. |
Low risk of bias |
No deviations from intended interventions identified. |
Low risk of bias |
100% of included participants were analyzed. |
Low risk of bias |
Time to sit down for the first time. |
Low risk of bias |
No deviation to the planned statistical analysis identified. Only one result provided. |
Low risk of bias |
No risk of bias identified. |
| Yamamoto 2016 |
Low risk of bias |
Randomisation was performed with a random number list generated by a computer software. No baseline differences between intervention groups identified. |
Low risk of bias |
No deviations from intended interventions identified. |
Low risk of bias |
100% of included participants were analyzed. |
Low risk of bias |
Time to first standing. |
Low risk of bias |
No deviation to the planned statistical analysis identified. Only one result provided. |
Low risk of bias |
No risk of bias identified. |
