Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 20;25:100395. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100395

Table 2.

Usefulness and feasibility of the EMA.

Ranking Clarity of EMA (n = 50) User friendliness (n = 50) Burden of filling out EMA during measurement period (n = 46) Would recommend app (n = 47)
Very bad (0–2) 0 0 1 (2%) 2 (not at all; 4%)
Bad (3–4) 0 0 2 (4%) 0 (no)
Medium (5–6) 2 (4%) 0 10 (22%) 5 (maybe; 9%)
Good (7–8) 22 (44%) 20 (40%) 16 (35%) 16 (most likely; 34%)
Very good (9–10) 26 (52%) 30 (60%) 17 (37%) 24 (definitely; 51%)