Table 3.
Usefulness and feasibility of the personalized report.
| Ranking | Recognition of personalized report (n = 44) | Comprehensibility of report (n = 42) | Insight in symptoms (n = 48) | Report enabled steps towards treatment (n = 40) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad (0–2) | 1 (2%) | 1 (2%) | 9 (19%) | 8 (20%) |
| Bad (3–4) | 0 | 0 | 1 (2%) | 2 (5%) |
| Medium (5–6) | 1 (2%) | 5 (12%) | 7 (15%) | 5 (13%) |
| Good (7–8) | 14 (32%) | 11 (26%) | 17 (35%) | 15 (38%) |
| Very good (9–10) | 28 (64%) | 25 (60%) | 14 (29%) | 10 (25%) |