Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gut. 2020 Nov 19;70(10):1946–1953. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322976

Table 3.

Diagnostic test characteristic of MRE, FIB-4, and MRE+FIB-4 (MEFIB Index) in detecting ≥ stage 2 fibrosis in UCSD-NAFLD Cohort and Japan-NAFLD Cohort

UCSD-NAFLD Cohort Japan-NAFLD Cohort
Model: AUROC
(95% CI)
OR (95% CI) p-
value*
PPV NPV AUROC
(95% CI)
OR (95% CI) p-
value
PPV NPV
MRE ≥ 3.3kPa 0.87 (0.81-0.92) MRE: 71.55 (28.73-178.18) ref 86.9 91.5 0.79 (0.74-0.85) MRE: 14.74 (7.60-28.57) ref 84.6 72.8
FIB-4 ≥ 1.6 0.72 (0.66-0.78) FIB-4: 8.23 (4.32-15.65) 0.0002 61.5 83.7 0.73 (0.68-0.79) FIB4: 8.31 (4.35-15.88) 0.0792 84.6 60.2
MRE ≥ 3.3kPa + FIB-4 ≥ 1.6 0.90 (0.85-0.95) MRE: 56.41(21.80-145.94)
FIB-4: 5.16 (2.04-13.06)
0.0184 97.1 83.2 0.84 (0.78-0.89) MRE: 8.96 (4.41-18.22)
FIB4: 3.57 (1.69-7.51)
0.0026 91.0 59.4

Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; MRE, magnetic resonance elastography, FIB-4, fibrosis – 4

*

p-value for comparison to MRE alone

cut-point was derived from the Youden’s Index in the UCSD-NAFLD Cohort

determined by categorizing a positive response as MRE ≥ 3.3kPa and FIB-4 ≥ 1.6 vs any other combination