Skip to main content
editorial
. 2020 Sep 15;36(5):1390–1394. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06218-x

Table 1.

Summary of Results from Studies of DTCA Associated Prescribing which Report Appropriateness Measures

Ref Methods N Exp to DTCA DTCA-patient-MD interaction Requestfulfilled Appropriateness Other outcomes LOE
6 Physician survey 535 - 56% of 395 surveyed “last-recalled” DTCA conversations resulted in a request for DTCA-drug 77% 49% of fulfilled requests deemed inappropriate Inaccurate advertisement, poor patient understanding of advertisement independently associated with inappropriate requests III
7 Physician survey 643 - 643 “last-recalled” DTCA-drug conversations, request rate NR 39% 48% felt other drugs were equally effective but wanted to accommodate patient Most common reasons for denial were cost and clinical considerations III
8 Patient and physician survey 500 81% 4.5% of 944 surveyed visits for any reason were DTCA-drug-related, 51% recalled DTCA-drug requests 76% NR, 46% reported no benefit of DTCA on patient interaction, 18% reported a negative effect Most common reasons for not prescribing were clinical and cost considerations, followed by insufficient information from the advertisement III
9 Case-control; outpatient DTCA visits compared with non-DTCA visits, patients and physicians surveyed 1431 94% 5.2% of 1431 surveyed visits for any reason were DTCA-drug-related 71% vs. 26% if no DTCA request (OR 16.9) 50% surveyed reported ambivalence about DTCA associated prescription Strong dose-response relationship between the number of ads viewed and likelihood to request DTCA drug II
10 Claims study; assessed appropriateness of COX-2 inhibitors prescription with clinical criteria 2929 80% 20% who viewed COX-2 advertising asked for a prescription 78% vs. 43% if no DTCA request Fourfold, and sevenfold increase in inappropriate, and appropriate prescribing of COX-2 inhibitors, respectively Specialist setting and increased age-associated with more appropriate prescription, female sex associated with inappropriate prescription II
11 Randomized trial; SP’s portraying MDD or AD with or without DTCA-drug request, clinical appropriateness assessed 298 - MDD: 101 DTCA-drug requests, 51 no request. AD: 98 DTCA-drug requests, 51 no request

MDD: 64% vs. 31% (OR: 8.0)

AD: 47% vs. 10% (OR: 13.3)

“Minimal acceptable care” met more frequently (90–98% vs. 56%) in DTCA-request group for MDD, 34% inappropriate prescription rate in AD Multivariate analysis: impact of DTCA-request on increasing prescription in AD much greater than that in MDD I

Ref reference number, n total units of analysis, Exp to DTCA patient exposure to DTCA, DTCA direct to consumer advertising, LOE level of evidence, NR not reported, OR odds ratio, SP standardized patient, MDD major depressive disorder, AD adjustment disorder