Table 2.
Results of One-Way ANOVAs of Experiment 2.
| Stimuli | Shininess | Softness | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # material | F-value | P value | F-value | P value | ||
| 1 S | F(10, 55) | 1.8 | >.05 | F(10, 55) | 0.5 | >.05 |
| 2 S | F(16, 85) | 3.8 | <.001* | F(16, 136) | 1.1 | >.05 |
| 3 S | F(12, 52) | 8.1 | <.001* | F(12, 91) | 3.2 | <.01 |
| 4 S | F(14, 60) | 10.1 | <.001* | F(14, 45) | 0.6 | >.05 |
| 5 S | F(16, 136) | 23.1 | <.001* | F(16, 85) | 6.7 | <.001* |
| 6 S | F(19, 60) | 3.7 | <.001* | F(19, 60) | 9.9 | <.001* |
| 7 S | F(11, 48) | 8.3 | <.001* | F(11, 84) | 5.7 | <.01 |
| 8 S | F(20, 84) | 15.8 | <.001* | F(20, 126) | 1.3 | >.05 |
| 9 S | F(12, 91) | 32.0 | <.001* | F(12, 65) | 0.7 | >.05 |
| 10 S | F(11, 96) | 6.2 | <.001* | F(11, 84) | 1.2 | >.05 |
| 11 S | F(16, 119) | 24.5 | <.001* | F(16, 136) | 1.7 | >.05 |
| 12 V | F(18, 76) | 13.1 | <.001* | F(18, 133) | 0.9 | >.05 |
| 13 V | F(10, 77) | 13.3 | <.001* | F(10, 66) | 2.7 | <.01 |
| 14 V | F(14, 90) | 10.7 | <.001* | F(14, 75) | 0.5 | >.05 |
| 15 V | F(8, 45) | 16.2 | <.001* | F(8, 27) | 0.2 | >.05 |
| 16 V | F(11, 84) | 3.4 | <.001* | F(11, 72) | 1.8 | >.05 |
| 17 V | F(12, 52) | 1.5 | >.05 | F(12, 52) | 5.8 | <.001* |
| 18 V | F(12, 52) | 1.2 | >.05 | F(12, 117) | 0.7 | >.05 |
| 19 V | F(12, 52) | 0.9 | >.05 | F(12, 52) | 0.6 | >.05 |
The numbering of the stimuli corresponds to that of Supplementary Figure S2 reported in italic in the supplementary materials. As can be seen, a significant effect (and thus a varying precept across the same fabric) was found more often for shininess than softness. Stimuli material identity is marked by an S for satin and a V for velvet.
*
The ANOVAs significant after Bonferroni correction.