Skip to main content
Archives of Public Health logoLink to Archives of Public Health
. 2021 May 19;79:81. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00605-4

Health insurance coverage and maternal healthcare services utilization in Jordan: evidence from the 2017–18 Jordan demographic and health survey

Petula Fernandes 1, Emmanuel Kolawole Odusina 2, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah 3, Komlan Kota 1, Sanni Yaya 4,5,
PMCID: PMC8132398  PMID: 34011379

Abstract

Background

Despite the relationship between health insurance coverage and maternal healthcare services utilization, previous studies in Jordan on the use of maternal healthcare services have mainly focused on patterns and determinants of maternal healthcare services utilization in Jordan. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between health insurance coverage and maternal healthcare services utilization in Jordan.

Methods

This study used secondary data published in 2017-18 Jordan Demographic and Health Survey on 4656 women of reproductive age (15–49 years). The independent variable was health insurance coverage and the outcome variable was maternal healthcare services utilization, measured through timing of first antenatal visit, four or more antenatal care visits, and skilled birth attendance. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression.

Results

Out of the total number of women who participated in the study, 38.2% were not covered by health insurance. With maternal healthcare utilization, 12.5%, 23.2%, and 10.1% respectively, failed to make early first antenatal care visit, complete four or more antenatal care visits and have their delivery attended by a skilled worker. After controlling for the socio-demographic factors, health insurance coverage was associated with increased odds of early timing of first antenatal care visits and completion of four or more antenatal care visits (aOR = 1.33, p < 0.05, aOR = 1.25, p < 0.01, respectively). However, women who were covered by health insurance were less likely to use skilled birth attendance during delivery (aOR = 0.72 p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Jordanian women with health insurance coverage were more likely to have early first antenatal care visits and complete four or more antenatal care visits. However, they were less likely to have their delivery attended by a skilled professional. This study provides evidence that health insurance coverage has contributed to increased maternal healthcare services utilization, only in terms of number and timing of antenatal care visits in Jordan. It is recommended that policy makers in Jordan should strengthen the coverage of health insurance in the country, especially among women of reproductive age in order to enhance the use of maternal healthcare services in the country.

Keywords: Maternal health care, Health insurance coverage, Jordan, Demographic and health surveys

Background

Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG-3) focuses on ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all, at all ages [1]. Target 3.8 of SDG-3 is centered on achieving universal health coverage (UHC) through financial risk protection and access to quality essential healthcare services [1, 2]. This target has two indicators - 3.8.1 on coverage of essential health services and 3.8.2 on the proportion of a country’s population with catastrophic spending on health [3]. It is imperative that both of these indicators are measured together to obtain a clear picture of which demographic groups in a population are unable to access healthcare, those that exhibit underutilization of healthcare services and those that encounter financial hardship due to healthcare expenditures [3]. It is key to stress that all segments of a population should be considered to identify the most disadvantaged communities that experience limited or no healthcare services due to financial constraints. In line with this, is the SDG’s pledge to “leave no one behind” to ensure that the fundamental human right to healthcare is extended to every individual regardless of age, sex, religion, socio-economic status, and life circumstance [4].

The 2017 UHC Monitoring Report revealed that at least half of the world’s population still lacks access to essential health services due to financial constraints [3]. Furthermore, some 800 million people spend more than 10% of their household budget on health and 100 million people are pushed to extreme poverty annually as a result of out-of-pocket health expenses [3]. In Jordan, health insurance providers include the Ministry of Health (MoH), the Royal Military, the University Hospital, the United Nations Refugee Welfare Association (UNRWA), the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), nongovernmental insurance, and private insurance [5]. An individual may have more than one form of coverage from the above listed sources. In total, 58% of women and 50% of men aged 15–49 have some type of health insurance coverage, while 42% of women and 50% of men do not have any health insurance [6]. This is still a substantial amount of the population that is left uninsured. Moreover, the Middle Eastern nation has experienced a drastic demographic change within the last decade with the large influx of Syrian refugees from neighboring Syria that have sought asylum in the country since the wake of the Syrian civil war [7]. Further to mention, Jordan also houses more than 2 million Palestinian refugees that have been residing in the country since 1948 [8]. This makes Jordan the largest refugee-hosting country worldwide [9]. Its non-national residents have placed a tremendous burden on the country’s healthcare system and largely remain unaccounted for in the government’s health insurance coverage scheme [10]. The current Jordanian government has established a goal to reach UHC, reduce health inequality and inequity and improve the quality of healthcare services for all its residents [5].

Maternal healthcare (MHC) is an example of an essential healthcare service that needs improvement in the country. MHC services during these periods are essential to the survival and well-being of the mother and infant [11]. The services that are considered standard include: timing of first antenatal care visit (ANC), four or more ANC visits, and skilled birth attendance, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccination, the third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine and the measles vaccine [12]. MHC serves as a significant intervention in decreasing maternal morbidity and mortality [13]. Additionally, the utilization of maternal services can be regarded as a prominent indicator of a population’s accessibility to receiving the treatment [14]. While individual-level factors such as socioeconomic situation, educational level and female decision-making power have been studied to assess under-utilization of MHC services, the effect of health insurance coverage has not received adequate attention for women in Jordan, especially within the last 5 years to reflect Jordan’s drastic demographic change [1517].

Despite the relationship between health insurance coverage and MHC services utilization [1821], previous studies in Jordan on the use of MHC services have mainly focused on patterns and determinants of MHC services utilization in Jordan [16, 22]. None of these studies looked at the link between health insurance coverage and MHC services utilization, while controlling for the effect of other important socio-demographic characteristics. Apart from this, the previous studies on MHC were conducted more than two decades ago and none of them used a nationally representative data such as the Demographic and Health Survey data. To fill the gap in literature, this study aims to examine the association between health insurance coverage and the utilization of MHC services among women in Jordan. This, in turn, will inform the design and implementation of evidence-based and population specific interventions and social policies that will work towards achieving UHC to facilitate access to quality MHC services to all women in need in Jordan. The findings will provide guidance for policy-makers in Jordan to address the substantial disparity in MHU among the twelve governorates by creating a comprehensive and equitable national health insurance scheme. Results of this secondary analysis will serve to inform the dire need to achieve universal health coverage as addressed in the 2017 Universal Health Coverage Monitoring Report [3] in order to meet one of the targets outlined in SDG-3 by the UN [1, 2]. In addition, this study’s findings also provide guidance for policy-makers in Jordan to address the substantial disparity in MHU among the twelve governorates by creating a comprehensive and equitable national health insurance scheme.

Conceptual framework

This study adopts the Health Care Services Utilization Model proposed by Anderson in the 1960s to examine the role health insurance coverage and other socio-demographic characteristics of women play in MHC services utilization in Jordan. The framework provides an explanation on the conditions that either promote or hinder the utilization of health care services [23]. This model identified three main conditions under which an individual will use or not use a health care service. These factors are the predisposing factors; enabling factors and need for care factors. Predisposing factors describe the demographic, social structure, and health belief characteristics of an individual. The demographic characteristics may include the sex of the individual, the age, and the marital status of the individual. Social Structure consists of education, ethnicity, and occupation while health belief factors are the values, attitudes of health care service providers, and knowledge about health. Enabling factors are the resources or means that are available to an individual to seek health care services. The enabling factors include income and health insurance coverage. Need for care factors refer to how an individual’s perceive their own general health and functional condition, as well as their familiarity with the signs and symptoms of ill health, agony and concerns about their health [24].

Methods

Data source

Data for this study were collected from the Jordan Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) conducted in 2017–18. The study included a sample of 4656 childbearing women aged (15–49 years). The sample was derived from childbearing women who had complete cases on all the variables of interest in this study. In this study, we treated missing values by using complete cases for our analysis. Hence, the unit of analysis in the study was childbearing women. The survey captures data on various socio-demographic characteristics of participants’ and health insurance coverage. The survey also captures data on the participants’ use of key maternal health services distributed among the factors of socio-demographics characteristics and health insurance coverage. The 2017–18 Jordan DHS survey is a representative household survey consisting of 19,400 residential households and the selected samples reflect the populations from which they were drawn. The survey used a stratified sample, selected in two stages from the 2015 census frame. Stratification was achieved by separating each governorate into urban and rural areas. Data for this study can be accessed via: https://dhsprogram.com/methodology/survey/survey-display-500.cfm.

Variables and measurements

Outcome variable

The outcome variable of interest was MHC services utilization. Variables were selected based on previous literature published on MHC services utilization. As determined by the WHO guidelines on essential MHC services, the following factors were used to measure MHC services utilization: timing of the first antenatal care visit (ANC), completing the recommended number of ANC visits, and giving birth at a health facility under skilled care. First trimester of a pregnancy is the recommended time for pregnant women to have their ANC consultation. Four spaced visits are the recommended number of ANC visits. Lastly, a skilled birth attendance involves having the expectant mother’s delivery be attended by a qualified health worker at a health facility.

Independent variables

The independent variable in this study was HIC. This was derived from the question ‘Are you covered by any health insurance?’ The responses were ‘Yes’ and ‘No’. For the purpose of the analysis, the responses were coded as 1 = “Yes” and 0 = “No”. The choice of health insurance coverage as the key independent variable was based on its association with MHC services utilization in previous studies [1821].

Covariates

To adjust the study’s analysis for potential confounding variables, socio-demographic variables such as age groups (15–19, 20–24, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, 45–49), education (no formal education, primary, secondary, post-secondary), occupation (not working, working), marital status (married, widowed/divorced/separated), area of residence (urban, rural), and wealth index (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, richest) were included. In DHS, wealth index is computed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based on the household assets and characteristics of the household [25]. Number of births in the past 5 years before the survey was conducted was dichotomized into “one birth” or “2 or more births”. Jordan’s regions were divided according to the country’s 12 governorates: Amman, Balga, Zarqua, Madaba, Irbid, Mafraq, Jerash, Aljoun, Karak, Tafilh, Maan, and Aquaba. These variables were not determined a priori; but were selected based on their availability in the 2017–18 Jordan Demographic and Health Survey, their theoretical relevance and practical significance in previous studies conducted in the country [16, 22].

Data analysis

The data were analyzed using both descriptive and regression methods with Stata version 14. First, descriptive statistics on the distribution of participants’ socio-demographic characteristics by health insurance coverage and MHC services utilization were performed. For MHC services utilization, timing of first ANC visit, completing the recommended number of ANC visits and giving birth under skilled labour attendance were analyzed. For all the analyses, the level of significance was set at p < 0.005 (2-tailed). To check for a high correlation among the independent variables, a test for multicollinearity was carried out using the variance inflation factor (VIF), and the results showed no evidence of high collinearity (Mean VIF = 1.49, Maximum VIF = 2.46, and Minimum VIF = 1.02). Next, a multivariable logistic regression was conducted to examine the independent association between health insurance coverage and the three factors used to measure MHC services utilization. The selection of variables into the regression model was based on the conceptual framework that guided the study and not their statistical significance in the chi-square test. Hence, all variables were included irrespective of their statistical significance in the chi-square test. The generated adjusted odds ratio (aOR) were estimated to assess the strength of the associations and used the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for significance testing. The analysis catered for the robustness of the standard errors. All frequency distributions were weighted while the survey command (SVY) in Stata was used to adjust for the complex sampling structure of the data in the regression analyses.

Results

Prevalence of health insurance coverage and maternal healthcare services utilization

The study sample consisted of 4656 participants. Of all the participants, 1780 (38.2%) reported no health insurance while 2875 (61.8%) were covered by a health insurance scheme of some sort. With MHU, 4076 (87.6%) had early first ANC visits while 580 (12.5%) had late first ANC visits; 3578 (76.9%) had the recommended number of ANC visits while 1078 (23.2%) did not have the recommended number of ANC visits; 4186 (89.9%) were assisted by a skilled attendant during delivery while 469 (10.1%) did not have skilled birth attendance (Table 1).

Table 1.

Distribution of participants by factors affecting use of maternal health services during pregnancy and birth among women of reproductive age in Jordan using the 2017–18 Jordan DHS (N = 4656)

Variables Timing of the first ANC visit Completed recommended number of ANC visits Birth attended by a skilled worker
No Yes P-value No Yes P-value No Yes P-value
N % N % N % N % N % N %
Health Insurance coverage
 No 284 15.9 1496 84.1 *** 449 25.3 1330 74.8 127 7.1 1653 92.9 ***
 Yes 296 10.3 2580 89.7 628 21.9 2248 78.2 343 11.9 2533 88.1
Education
 No education 12 18.8 52 81.2 *** 26 40.8 38 59.3 *** 9 13.4 56 86.6 ***
 Primary 45 14.7 264 85.3 121 39.2 188 60.8 37 11.9 272 88.1
 Secondary 355 14.5 2089 85.5 629 25.8 1814 74.3 284 11.6 2160 88.4
 Post-secondary 168 9.1 1671 90.9 301 16.4 1538 83.6 140 7.6 1699 92.4
Age groups
 15–19 13 8.8 139 91.2 * 41 27.1 111 72.9 27 17.8 126 82.2
 20–24 112 13.5 718 86.5 200 24.1 629 75.9 88 10.6 742 89.4
 25–29 129 9.6 1211 90.4 319 23.8 1020 76.2 125 9.3 1215 90.7
 30–34 158 13.4 1018 86.6 246 20.9 930 79.1 116 9.9 1060 90.1
 35–39 117 14.4 700 85.6 185 22.6 633 77.4 87 10.6 731 89.4
 40–44 49 16.0 257 84.0 78 25.6 227 74.4 25 8.0 281 92.0
 45–49 2 4.8 32 95.2 8 22.7 26 77.3 1 4.3 32 95.7
Occupation
 Not working 525 12.8 3572 87.2 986 24.1 3112 75.9 ** 434 10.6 3664 89.4 **
 Working 54 9.8 504 90.2 92 16.4 466 83.6 36 6.4 523 93.6
Marital status
 Married 578 12.5 4036 87.5 1061 23.0 3554 77.0 ** 466 10.1 4149 89.9 ***
 Single 2 5.1 39 94.9 17 41.1 24 58.9 4 9.3 38 90.7
Area of Residence
 Urban 538 13.1 3573 86.9 923 22.5 3188 77.6 0.120 371 9.0 3740 91.0 ***
 Rural 42 7.6 503 92.4 155 28.5 390 71.6 98 18.1 446 81.9
Wealth Index
 Poorest 146 12.1 1065 87.9 408 33.7 803 66.3 *** 204 16.8 1007 83.2 ***
 Poorer 152 13.8 945 86.2 278 25.3 818 74.7 131 12.0 965 88.0
 Middle 133 12.5 929 87.5 199 18.8 863 81.2 89 8.4 972 91.6
 Richer 93 11.4 726 88.6 140 17.1 679 82.9 35 4.2 785 95.8
 Richest 56 12.0 412 88.0 53 11.3 415 88.7 10 2.2 4186 89.9
Number of Births in the last 5 years
 One birth 276 11.2 2198 88.8 *** 525 21.2 1949 78.8 *** 199 8.0 2275 92.0 ***
 Two or more 304 13.9 1878 86.1 553 25.4 1629 74.7 270 12.4 1912 87.6
Region
 Amman 304 18.4 1345 81.6 *** 262 15.9 1387 84.1 *** 68 4.1 1581 95.9 ***
 Balga 25 10.9 204 89.1 52 22.8 177 77.2 5 2.3 224 97.7
 Zarqua 70 11.3 551 88.7 148 23.9 472 76.1 46 7.4 575 92.6
 Madaba 29 23.5 94 76.5 24 19.4 99 80.6 24 19.6 99 80.4
 Irbid 66 7.0 871 93.0 232 24.8 704 75.2 124 13.2 813 86.8
 Mafraq 34 9.3 335 90.8 138 37.5 231 62.5 92 24.8 277 75.2
 Jerash 15 8.7 152 91.3 48 29.0 118 71.0 34 20.3 133 79.7
 Aljoun 4 3.6 119 96.4 29 23.7 94 76.3 25 20.0 99 80.0
 Karak 11 7.2 147 92.8 47 29.8 111 70.2 21 13.2 137 86.9
 Tafilh 6 7.6 73 92.4 21 26.2 58 73.8 5 6.2 74 93.8
 Ma’an 10 12.0 73 88.0 32 38.1 51 61.9 12 14.8 71 85.2
 Aquaba 6 4.8 113 95.2 44 36.7 75 63.3 15 12.4 104 87.6
 National 580 12.5 4076 87.6 1078 23.2 3578 76.9 469 10.1 4186 89.9

Here *, ** and *** indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively

Distribution of maternal health utilization across health insurance coverage and other socio-demographic characteristics of respondents

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the 4656 participants stratified by utilization of MHC services as per the guidelines set forth by the WHO.

In this study, a higher proportion of those with health insurance coverage had early timing of first ANC visit compared to their counterparts (89.7% vs 84.1%, p < 0.001). Timing of the first ANC visit differed across the various socio-demographic characteristics. For example, it was higher among women with a post-secondary education than those with no formal education (90.9% vs. 81.2%, p < 0.001). Additionally, it was higher among women in the 45–49 age group (95.2%), working women (90.2%), and women residing in rural areas (92.4%). Additionally, timing of the first ANC visit was higher among the richer and richest on the wealth index, 88.6 and 88.0% respectively, compared to the poorer and poorest, 86.2 and 87.9% respectively. There were proportionally significant variations across the 12 governorates of Jordan, with the Aquaba region showing the highest proportion of women having the proper timing of their ANC visit (95.2%) compared to only 76.5% in the Madaba region (p < 0.001).

There was no difference between those with or without health insurance coverage in completing the recommended four ANC visits (74.8% vs. 78.2%, p = 0.072). Additionally, age was not a significant factor in seeing a higher or lower completion rate (p = 0.401). Women with no formal education were less likely to complete the recommended number of ANC visits (p < 0.001). This observation was also true for women making up the poorest quintile on the wealth index (p < 0.001). Married women reported higher ANC visits than their single counterparts (77.0% vs. 58.9%, p < 0.01). Disparity of completion rate was seen between certain governorates such as 61.9% vs. 84.1% of Maan and Amman respectively (p < 0.001).

Lastly, majority of the study population (90%) reported to have delivered at health facilities under skilled attendants. Counter intuitively, a higher proportion of those with health insurance coverage choose not to have a skilled birth, compared to women without health insurance coverage (11.9% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.001). Those with no formal education had lower skilled birth rates than their post-secondary level counterparts (86.6% vs 92.4, p < 0.001). Age was not a significant factor in determining delivery assistance (p = 0.216). Contrary to the results of ANC completion rates, 90.7% of single women had a skilled birth than married women (p < 0.001). Women living in rural areas reported lower skilled birth deliveries compared to their urban counterparts (81.9 vs 91.0%, p < 0.001). Women of the richer quintile category had their delivery attended by skilled workers in higher proportion compared to those of the poorest wealth quintile (95.8% vs. 83.2%, p < 0.001). Occupational status, parity and the region also demonstrated significant differences with skilled birth attendance in this study (p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively).

Association between health insurance and maternal healthcare services utilization

Table 2 shows the results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis of the association between health insurance coverage and MHC services utilization. After controlling for the socio-demographic factors, health insurance coverage was associated with increased odds of timing of first ANC visits and recommended completion rate of ANC visits (aOR = 1.33, p < 0.05, aOR = 1.25, p < 0.01, respectively). However, women who were covered by health insurance were less likely to use skilled birth attendance during delivery (aOR = 0.72 p < 0.001).

Table 2.

Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) for the association between health insurance coverage and maternal health service utilization among women of reproductive age in Jordan using the 2017–18 Jordan DHS (N = 4656)

Variables Timing of the first ANC visit Completed recommended number of ANC visits Birth attended by a skilled worker
aOR 95% CI P-value aOR 95% CI P-value aOR 95% CI P-value
Health Insurance coverage
 No 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Yes 1.326 1.069–1.643 * 1.249 1.072–1.455 ** 0.718 0.582–0.886 **
Education
 No formal education 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Primary 1.500 0.804–2.799 1.452 0.935–2.254 0.674 0.362–1.253
 Secondary 1.290 0.747–2.229 1.764 1.186–2.621 ** 0.681 0.383–1.209
 Post-secondary 1.721 0.963–3.075 2.455 1.620–3.722 *** 0.744 0.0.410–1.351
Age groups
 15–19 1.0 1.0 1.0
 20–24 0.885 0.482–1.624 1.135 0.796–1.620 0.940 0.611–1.448
 25–29 0.820 0.451–1.490 0.962 0.679–1.365 0.989 0.645–1.515
 30–34 0.763 0.419–1.391 1.120 0.786–1.594 0.972 0.632–1.494
 35–39 0.613 0.334–1.122 1.002 0.699–1.437 0.968 0.623–1.504
 40–44 0.475 0.249–0.905 * 0.972 0.648–1.458 1.330 0.784–2.257
 45–49 0.356 0.131–0.970 * 1.146 0.535–2.454 1.552 0.504–4.784
Occupation
 Not working 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Working 0.976 0.703–1.354 0.978 0.783–1.222 1.228 0.906–1.665
Marital status
 Married 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Single 0.700 0.283–1.733 0.385 0.205–0.726 ** 0.757 0.323–1.775
Area of Residence 1.0
 Urban 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Rural 1.149 0.887–1.488 0.993 0.843–1.171 0.778 0.638–0.947 *
Wealth Index
 Poorest 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Poorer 1.141 0.885–1.471 1.201 1.015–1.420 * 1.428 1.159–1.760 **
 Middle 1.067 0.808–1.409 1.539 1.270–1865 *** 1.671 1.312–2.130 ***
 Richer 1.223 0.864–1.731 1.555 1.221–1.980 *** 2.284 1.608–3.242 ***
 Richest 1.680 1.003–2.815 * 1.641 1.127–2. 391 * 6.572 2.634–16.401 ***
Number of Births in the last 5 years
 One birth 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Two or more 0.678 0.558–0.824 *** 0.752 0.660–0.856 *** 0.803 0.681–0.947 **
Region
 Amman 1.0 1.0 1.0
 Balga 1.991 1.274–3.112 ** 0.781 0.541–1.127 2.379 0.993–5.700
 Zarqua 2.472 1.669–3.663 *** 0.921 0.667–1.272 0.504 0.297–0.855 *
 Madaba 0.703 0.496–0.996 0.946 0.663–1.349 0.279 0.166–0.470 ***
 Irbid 2.980 1.931–5.598 *** 0.639 0.464–0. 881 ** 0.372 0.222–0.625 ***
 Mafraq 2.653 1.789–3. 934 *** 0.469 0.346–0.635 *** 0.230 0.141–0.376 ***
 Jerash 2.266 1.496–3.431 *** 0.547 0.396–0.755 *** 0.276 0.166–0.457 ***
 Aljoun 6.144 3.433–10.995 *** 0.643 0.460–0.898 * 0.248 0.149–0.413 ***
 Karak 2.447 1.464–4.090 ** 0.445 0.312–0.636 *** 0.429 0.243–0.757 **
 Tafilh 2.312 1.490–3.588 *** 0.576 0.413–0.805 ** 0.997 0.547–1.817
 Ma’an 1.932 1.226–3.045 ** 0.340 0.242–0.479 *** 0.361 0.209–0.623 ***
 Aquaba 3.879 2.271–6.627 *** 0.317 0.228–0.440 *** 0.365 0.211–0.631 ***

Here *, ** and *** indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively

Early timing of first ANC visit was lower among older women (aOR = 0.36, p < 0.05) and women with two or more births (aOR = 0.68, p < 0.001) compared to younger women and women with one birth. Higher odds of early first ANC visit was observed among richest women (aOR = 1.68, p < 0.001) and women in all other regions of the country compared to poorest women and women who lived in the Amman region, respectively.

Having a post-secondary education (aOR = 2.46, p < 0.001) and richest wealth index (aOR = 1.64, p < 0.05) increased the likelihood of completing the recommended number of ANC visits significant association with completing the recommended number of ANC visits (aOR = 2.46, p < 0.001). However, lower odds of completing the recommended number of ANC visits was found among single women compared to married women (aOR = 0.39, p < 0.01); women with two or more births compared to one birth (aOR = 0.75, p < 0.001) and in all other regions compared to Amman.

The odds of skilled birth attendance increased with wealth index, with richest women having the highest odds compared to poorest women (aOR = 6.57, p < 0.001). The odds of skilled birth attendance was lower among women who lived in the rural areas (aOR = 0.78, p < 0.001), those with two or more births (aOR = 0.80, p < 0.01) and those who lived in all other regions of the country compared to those who lived in urban areas, those with one birth and those who lived in the Amman region, respectively.

Discussion

This study reports the prevalence of health insurance ownership among Jordanian women across various socio-demographic backgrounds in addition to the association between health insurance coverage and the three key maternal health services; timing of first ANC visit, meeting the recommended four ANC visits and having a skilled birth attendance. This is the first comprehensive study to discuss the association between health insurance ownership and maternal health utilization in Jordan using data from 2017 to 18.

Overall, 38.2% of the study participants reported having no health insurance coverage in the present study. Findings on the prevalence of health insurance coverage is similar but slightly higher than the prevalence obtained in a recent study, where the coverage of health insurance was about 27% [26]. The possible reason for the differences in findings could be the study population and sample size. With MHC services utilization, 12.5, 23.2, and 10.1% respectively, failed to make early first antenatal care visit, complete the recommended number of antenatal care visits and have their delivery attended by a skilled worker. Findings on the prevalence of MHC services utilization is in line with previous studies [27, 28]. The high prevalence of MHU in the country could be attributed to the improvement in maternal healthcare through universal health coverage and the implementation of health insurance in the country [5, 6] and general improvement in access to MHC services utilization through the provision of health facilities and presence of health professionals in those health facilities [29].

After controlling for the socio-demographic factors, we found that health insurance coverage was associated with increased odds of timing of first ANC visits and recommended completion rate of ANC visits. Similar findings were obtained in previous studies [1821]. The possible reason for the finding could be that health insurance coverage reduces the rates of out-of-pocket payments associated with the use of MHC services utilization. Such payments may pose as financial barriers to women when accessing maternal healthcare services. Interestingly, women who were covered by health insurance were less likely to use skilled birth attendance during delivery. This finding is contradicts the findings of previous studies that found a positive association between health insurance coverage and skilled birth attendance [30, 31]. Further studies are needed to unearth the possible reasons for the negative association between health insurance coverage and skilled birth attendance during delivery in Jordan.

Age, wealth index, region, and parity were all positively associated with timely ANC initiation. This result ties well with a study that examined determinants of ANC attendance among Jordanian women living in disadvantaged communities [32]. Being insured gives women a valid reason to make use of available ANC services. As hypothesized, being insured does yield uptake of maternal services as women are not left financially strained in doing so. Possessing higher education informs women on the necessity of initiating an ANC visit within the first trimester. Younger women and women with higher parity also adhered to the recommended timing of ANC initiation. There was regional variation in this study among Jordan’s twelve governotes. Aljoun, Aquaba and Irbid all fared high in proper ANC initiation while Madaba scored the lowest. This study recommends looking at the strategies that have been effective in promoting a timely ANC visit in the former three governorates. Occupation, marital status, area of residence and wealth index had no influence on the timely starting of ANC visits in this study. Considering that ANC is provided free of charge in Jordan, this may explain the non-significant associations [32].

This analysis found evidence for education, marital status, wealth index and parity influencing respondents to completing the four recommended ANC visits. As observed with the first key maternal health service, educated women are more informed of pregnancy-related risks and will thus adhere to completing the required amount of ANC visits in comparison to lower and non-educated women. In line with other studies [5, 16, 17], education proves to be a strong determinant in uptake of maternal health services. Being employed was a positive indicator for women fulfilling advised ANC visits as having a stable job grants financial security, thus allowing expectant mothers to be able to afford maternal services. Married women were more likely to meet the four standard visits than their single counterparts. This can be attributed to married women receiving financial and emotional support from their spouses to partake in maternal services. Women placed on the richer and richest category on the wealth index met the ANC visit completion rate. Above average financial standing readily equips women to be able to afford these services. Lastly, parity was positively associated with ANC visits; this can be owed to women having more experience and acquired knowledge from prior pregnancies. Once again, regional variation was observed among the dozen governorates. The Ma’an region saw the lowest completion rate, in which less than three-quarters of participants failed to meet the recommended ANC visits. Associations with health insurance coverage, age and area of residence did not reach statistically significant levels in the present analysis. As with the preceding section, this may be attributable to Jordan offering ANC services at no charge.

The findings in this study revealed that area of residence, wealth index and parity influenced the study participants to have a skilled birth attendance. Educated expectant mothers are likely to be aware of birthing-risks and may opt to have their delivery under the care of a skilled worker [1721, 33]. As discussed in the former sections, being employed and married comes with the benefit of greater financial security and thus promotes use of maternal services. Urban residents reported higher rates of skilled birth attendance than women residing in rural areas. This can be owed to urban regions having a greater prevalence of maternal facilities due to greater demand. As seen earlier, higher parity comes with more experience and thus women would be more familiar with the birthing process and could recognize the benefits of receiving a skilled birth attendance. Of intriguing note, single women reported a higher proportion of professional deliveries than their married and insured counterparts. This seemingly exceptional observation was also documented in a similar study [33] which stated that women living independently, and women-head households exercise greater autonomy and decision-making power with regard to using maternal health care services. A comprehensive community-level interventions that consider residential homogeneity regarding infrastructure (e.g., health facilities, roads) and socioeconomic empowerment (e.g., educational and vocational training) could promote women health-promoting behaviours and their access to maternal healthcare services.

Prior studies have revealed that there are significant disparities with respect to the quality of health services between the health sector institutions and between Jordan’s various governorates [16, 17, 32]. This study was no exception. With skilled birth attendance, Mafraq and Jerash scored poorly in comparison to Balga and Amman. The consistent disparities across the governorates is likely due to certain regions being more rural and having a hasher desert climate than others which makes having equipped maternal facilities and trained health workers more challenging. Thus, factors other than health insurance coverage, such as availability, access and quality of maternal services, may pose as the larger underlying issue to MHC services utilization. For example, a qualitative study conducted on Jordanian women regarding their delivery experience reported that maltreatment by health providers impacted their decision-making in choosing to have a midwife over a skilled birth attendant for future pregnancies [34]. Concerted efforts from the regional and national government should be enacted to implement strategies to promote MHC services utilization to bridge the disparity between the advanced governorates and the disadvantaged ones.

Strengths and limitations

The study used nationally representative data from the DHS, and therefore the findings are generalizable in the study area. However, results of the present study should be discussed in light of its limitations. Firstly, the primary source of the information collected from the study participants was through self-report. This data collection method allows for recall bias which could have resulted in underestimation or overestimation of past experiences, especially given that the chosen variable for parity included a span of 5 years. Second, the study was limited to the variables that were available on the DHS questionnaire; other potentially relevant socio-demographic factors, such as affiliated religion, were not analyzed. Lastly, this study excluded respondents that were not of Jordanian nationality. Given Jordan’s diverse demographic make-up, most notably Syrian and Palestinian refugees that have sought asylum in the country in recent decades [7, 8], it would be of significance to explore this population’s health insurance status and utilization of the essential maternal services. In terms of study design, the study used a cross-sectional research design that limits causal relations between the studied variables. Findings of the study cannot be generalized to all women of reproductive age but only childbearing women. Finally, we acknowledge that there might be some health system factors that affect the variance in the coverage of insurance, and hence MHC services utilization. However, we could not assess this since the dataset does not provide data on it.

Conclusion

Based on our findings, having health insurance is an enabling resource that promotes maternal healthcare-seeking behaviour. Our study confirms that insured women had increased odds in initiating ANC at the required time, completing of four ANC visits and having a skilled birth attendance. These are all indicators that demonstrate a positive association between health insurance coverage and maternal healthcare services utilization for women in Jordan. This is an important finding in the understanding of improving maternal health in Jordan and globally. Working towards achieving universal health coverage, which is target 3.8 of SGD-3, would impact women positively in seeing greater uptake of essential maternal services. Looking forward, Jordan should consider a cost-effective and equitable plan to account for this population in securing their financial and health status, to especially advance maternal health among its disadvantaged women. Further research should investigate the health insurance and maternal health status on Jordan’s non-citizens, specifically its large Syrian and Palestinian refugee population that are typically excluded from national surveys and the government’s health insurance scheme.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the MEASURE DHS project for their support and for free access to the original data.

Abbreviations

ANC

Antenatal Care

HIC

Health Insurance Coverage

MHU

Maternal Health Utilization

SDGs

Sustainable Development Goals

Authors’ contributions

SY contributed to the study design and conceptualization. PF reviewed the literature. PF and EKO performed the analysis. BOA and KK helped with the data analysis. All authors provided technical support and critically reviewed the manuscript for its intellectual content. SY had final responsibility to submit for publication. All authors read and amended drafts of the paper and approved the final version.

Funding

There was no funding for this study.

Availability of data and materials

Data for this study were sourced from Demographic and Health surveys (DHS) and available here: http://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was not required for this study since the data is secondary and is available in the public domain. More details regarding DHS data and ethical standards are available at: http://goo.gl/ny8T6X.

Consent for publication

No consent to publish was needed for this study as we did not use any details, images or videos related to individual participants. In addition, data used are available in the public domain.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Petula Fernandes, Email: pfern100@uottawa.ca.

Emmanuel Kolawole Odusina, Email: kolaodusina@yahoo.co.uk.

Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, Email: brightahinkorah@gmail.com.

Komlan Kota, Email: kkota029@uottawa.ca.

Sanni Yaya, Email: sanni.yaya@uOttawa.ca.

References

  • 1.Osborn D, Cutter A, Ullah F. Universal Sustainable Developmental Goals Understanding the Transformative Challenge from Developed Countries. Stakeholder Forum. 2015; [cited 2019 Oct 15].
  • 2.United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals: United Nations. Available from: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/. [cited 2019 Oct 15]
  • 3.World Health Organization and The World Bank. Tracking Universal Health Coverage: 2017 Global Monitoring Report. Switzerland: World Health Organization and The World Bank; 2017. Available from: http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/193371513169798347/2017-global-monitoring-report.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2019. [cited 2019 Oct 15]
  • 4.United Nations CDP Committee for Development Policy. Leaving no one behind. New York: United Nations CDP Committee for Development Policy; 2018. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/2754713_July_PM_2._Leaving_no_one_behind_Summary_from_UN_Committee_for_Development_Policy.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2019. [cited 2019 Oct 15]
  • 5.Halasa Y, Nandakumar AK. Factors determining choice of health care provider in Jordan. EMHJ. 2009;15(4):959–968. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Department of Statistics (DOS) and ICF. Jordan Population and Family and Health Survey 2017-18. Amman: Department of Statistics (DOS) and ICF; 2019. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR346/FR346.pdf. [cited 2019 Oct 15]
  • 7.Tappis H, Lyles E, Burton A, Doocy S. Maternal health care utilization among Syrian refugees in Lebanon and Jordan. MCHJ. 2017;21(9):1798–1807. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2315-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arneberg M. Living conditions among Palestinian refugees and displaced in Jordan. Norway: Fafo Institute for Applied Social Science; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. Jordan: United Nations; 2017. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/memberstates/jordan. [cited 2019 Oct 15]
  • 10.Toebes B, Ferguson R, Markovic MM, Nnamuchi O. The right to health a multi-country study of law, policy and practice. Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.World Health Organization. Maternal Health. World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/maternal-health/en/. [cited 2019 Oct 15]
  • 12.Babalola S, Fatusi A. Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria-looking beyond individual and household factors. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2009;9(1):1-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Firoz T, McGaw-Binns A, Fillipi V, Magee LA, Costa M, Cecatti JG, Barreix M, Adanu R, Chou D, Say L. A framework for healthcare interventions to address maternal morbidity. NCBI. 2018;141(1):61–68. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Haruna U, Dandeebo G, Galaa SZ. Improving access and utilization of maternal healthcare services through focused antenatal care in rural Ghana: a qualitative study. Advances in Public Health. 2019;1(2):1-11.
  • 15.Ahmed S, Creanga AA, Gillespie DG, Tsui AO. Economic status, education and empowerment: implications for maternal health service utilization in developing countries. PloS one. 2010;5(6):1-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Obermeyer CM, Potter JE. Maternal health care utilization in Jordan: a study of patterns and determinants. JSTOR. 1991;22(3):177–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rasha AS, Sharaf MF. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Maternity Care Utilization: Evidence from Egypt, Jordan and Yemen. WOL. 2017;29(8):1062–1074. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang W, Temsah G, Mallick L. The impact of health insurance on maternal health care utilization: evidence from Ghana, Indonesia and Rwanda. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(3):366–375. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Comfort AB, Peterson LA, Hatt LE. Effect of health insurance on the use and provision of maternal health services and maternal and neonatal health outcomes: a systematic review. J Health Popul Nutr. 2013;31(4 Suppl 2):S81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kibusi SM, Sunguya BF, Kimunai E, Hines CS. Health insurance is important in improving maternal health service utilization in Tanzania—analysis of the 2011/2012 Tanzania HIV/AIDS and malaria indicator survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2924-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yaya S, Da F, Wang R, Tang S, Ghose B. Maternal healthcare insurance ownership and service utilisation in Ghana: analysis of Ghana demographic and health survey. Plos One. 2019;14(4):e0214841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Abbas AA, Walker GJ. Determinants of the utilization of maternal and child health services in Jordan. Int J Epidemiol. 1986;15(3):404–407. doi: 10.1093/ije/15.3.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Andersen R, Newman JF. Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society. 1973;95-124. [PubMed]
  • 24.Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;1–0. [PubMed]
  • 25.Rutstein SO, Johnson K. The DHS wealth index. DHS comparative reports no. 6. Calverton: ORC Macro; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu M, Luo Z, Zhou D, Ji L, Zhang H, Ghose B, Tang S, Wang R, Feng D. Determinants of health insurance ownership in Jordan: a cross-sectional study of population and family health survey 2017–2018. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e038945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alyahya MS, Khader YS, Batieha A, Asad M. The quality of maternal-fetal and newborn care services in Jordan: a qualitative focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4232-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hijazi HH, Alyahya MS, Sindiani AM, Saqan RS, Okour AM. Determinants of antenatal care attendance among women residing in highly disadvantaged communities in northern Jordan: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0542-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Khader YS, Alyahya MS, Al-Sheyab NA, Shattnawi KK, Saqer HR, Batieha A. Evaluation of maternal and newborn health services in Jordan. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:439. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S171982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khan SM, Singh K. The association between health insurance coverage and skilled birth attendance in Ghana: a national study. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(3):534–541. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1851-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Were LP, Were E, Wamai R, Hogan J, Galarraga O. The Association of Health Insurance with institutional delivery and access to skilled birth attendants: evidence from the Kenya demographic and health survey 2008–09. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–0. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2397-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.2019. The National Strategy For Health Sector In Jordan 2015–2019. [ebook] Amman: The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan The High Health Council. Available at: http://www.hhc.gov.jo/uploadedimages/The%20National%20Strategy%20for%20Health%20Sector%20in%20Jordan%202015-2019.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2020
  • 33.Leone T, James KS, Padmadas SS. The burden of maternal health care expenditure in India: multilevel analysis of National Data. Matern Child Health J. 2012;17(9):1622–1630. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1174-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hatamleh R, Shaban IA, Homer C. Evaluating the experience of Jordanian women with maternity care services. Health Care Women Int. 2013;34(6):499–512. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2012.680996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data for this study were sourced from Demographic and Health surveys (DHS) and available here: http://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.


Articles from Archives of Public Health are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES