Table 2.
Survey-Weighted Distribution of Attraction and Partnering Patterns Among Cisgender Women, by Sexual Identity (n=741)
(Table 2- Cisgender Women) |
QUEER (6.0%; n=48) |
LESBIAN/GAY (33.1%; n=301) |
BISEXUAL (55.5%; n=347) |
OTHER (5.5%; n=45) |
Variable level Bonferroni- corrected p-value |
Overall p-value |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measure | % | SE | % | SE | % | SE | % | SE | ||
Any attraction (n=736) | ||||||||||
No | 6.7 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 7.1 | 4.2 | n.s. | <.001 |
Yes | 93.3 | 6.3 | 99.4 | 0.5 | 99.8 | 0.2 | 92.9 | 4.2 | ||
Gendered attraction patterns (n=729) † | ||||||||||
Women only | 15.3 | 6.5 | 75.8 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 7.4 | 3.4 | a, d, e, | <.001 |
Men only | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | <.0.1 | <.0.1 | 0 | 0 | NA | |
Women and Men | 84.7 | 6.5 | 24.2 | 3.0 | 98.4 | 0.8 | 92.6 | 3.4 | a, d, e | |
Attracted to women (n=728) † | ||||||||||
Cisgender women only | 37.6 | 7.9 | 80.2 | 2.9 | 61.6 | 3.2 | 29.4 | 8.1 | a, b, d, e, f | |
Transgender women only | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | |
Cis- and transgender women | 62.4 | 7.9 | 19.8 | 2.9 | 38.5 | 3.2 | 70.6 | 8.1 | a, b, d, e, f | |
Attracted to men (n=491) † | ||||||||||
Cisgender men only | 24.0 | 7.1 | 44.7 | 6.9 | 53.1 | 3.3 | 19.3 | 8.0 | b, e, f | <.001 |
Transgender men only | 8.7 | 4.3 | 37.2 | 6.8 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 12.1 | 5.8 | a, d, e | |
Cis- and transgender men | 67.3 | 7.8 | 18.1 | 5.6 | 45.2 | 3.3 | 68.6 | 9.1 | a, b, d, e, f | |
Any sexual partners, past 5 years (n=741) | ||||||||||
No | 9.8 | 4.6 | 9.7 | 2.1 | 10.4 | 2.0 | 13.5 | 5.5 | N/A | 0.923 |
Yes | 90.2 | 4.6 | 90.3 | 2.1 | 89.6 | 2.0 | 86.5 | 5.5 | ||
Gendered partnering patterns; n=652) † | ||||||||||
Women only | 18.8 | 6.6 | 83.3 | 3.3 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 23.0 | 7.3 | a, d, e, f | |
Men only | 15.6 | 7.9 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 34.9 | 3.3 | 32.6 | 9.2 | d, e | <.001 |
Women and men | 65.6 | 8.8 | 14.5 | 3.2 | 60.2 | 3.3 | 44.4 | 9.9 | a, d, e | |
Sex Partners—Women (n=521) † | 0.417 | |||||||||
Cisgender women only | 91.8 | 4.3 | 97.5 | 1.2 | 95.4 | 1.6 | 94.9 | 5.0 | n.s. | |
Transgender women only | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0 | 0 | n.s. | |
Cis- and transgender women | 8.3 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 5.1 | 5.0 | n.s. | |
Sex Partners--Men (n=378) † | ||||||||||
Cisgender men only | 85.3 | 6.5 | 86.3 | 8.9 | 96.4 | 1.4 | 94.4 | 3.3 | n.s. | 0.036 |
Transgender men only | 0 | 0 | 8.1 | 7.6 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | n.s. | |
Cis- and transgender men | 14.7 | 6.5 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | n.s. | |
Currently in Relationship | 65.9 | 7.8 | 65.5 | 3.5 | 66.4 | 3.1 | 66.7 | 8.1 | N/A | 0.997 |
Current Partner Gender (n=486) | ||||||||||
Cisgender woman | 40.1 | 10.2 | 97.5 | 1.6 | 9.4 | 2.0 | 41.8 | 10.9 | a, b, d, e, f | |
Cisgender man | 56.3 | 10.3 | 0 | 0 | 88.1 | 2.3 | 56.7 | 11.0 | a, b, d, e, f | <.001 |
Trans/GQNB | 3.6 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 | n.s. |
Note. All proportions and standard errors (SE) weighted using Generations survey weights; all n’s unweighted. Percentages may not add to 100.0% due to weighting and/or rounding
‘Variable level Bonferroni-corrected p-value’ indicates if distribution of specific variable level (e.g. “cisgender women only”) differs non-significantly (n.s.), or significantly (p<.05), using adjusted Wald tests, incorporating Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, between:
Queer and Lesbian/Gay
Queer and Bisexual
Queer and Other
Lesbian/Gay and Bisexual
Lesbian/Gay and Other
Bisexual and Other
Variable-level analysis only computed for variables with statistically significant ‘overall p-value,’ which tests overall association (Pearson’s chi2 test) between variable and sexual identity. If overall association is non-significant, variable-level analysis is not computed (hence ‘N/A,’ aka ‘not applicable’)
Gendered attraction patterns are only reported for respondents with any stated attraction; for the purpose of this variable, women (and men) include both cis- and/or transgender people. Attracted to women /attracted to men are only reported for those who stated attraction to people of that gender. Sexual partnering variables follow similar patterns.