Table 2.
Sagittal analysis—SNA: Gender, Types of Cleft and Gender times types of cleft two-way ANOVA analysis results.
| Gender | Type | Mean | SD | Cleft type | Mean | Multiple comparison | MD | SE | p-value | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||||||||||
| Male | NC | 79.296 | 3.306 | NC | 79.795 | NC | vs | BCLP | 4.841* | 1.108 | 0.000 | 2.646 | 7.036 |
| BCLP | 74.654 | 4.346 | BCLP | 74.953 | vs | UCLP | 3.637* | 0.961 | 0.000 | 1.733 | 5.541 | ||
| UCLP | 76.267 | 4.751 | UCLP | 76.158 | vs | UCL | 0.352 | 1.335 | 0.792 | −2.293 | 2.997 | ||
| UCL | 77.709 | 3.887 | UCL | 79.443 | vs | UCLA | 1.752 | 1.598 | 0.275 | −1.414 | 4.918 | ||
| UCLA | 78.542 | 3.424 | UCLA | 78.042 | BCLP | vs | UCLP | −1.204 | 1.046 | 0.252 | −3.277 | 0.869 | |
| Total | 76.735 | 4.429 | vs | UCL | −4.489* | 1.398 | 0.002 | −7.258 | −1.720 | ||||
| Female | NC | 80.294 | 3.641 | vs | UCLA | −7.026* | 1.704 | 0.001 | −11.905 | −2.146 | |||
| BCLP | 75.253 | 2.303 | UCLP | vs | UCL | −3.285* | 1.284 | 0.012 | −5.830 | −0.740 | |||
| UCLP | 76.049 | 4.170 | vs | UCLA | −1.885 | 1.556 | 0.228 | −4.968 | 1.198 | ||||
| UCL | 81.177 | 5.072 | UCL | vs | UCLA | 1.400 | 1.811 | 0.441 | −2.188 | 4.988 | |||
| UCLA | 77.543 | 1.139 | |||||||||||
| Total | 77.920 | 4.339 | |||||||||||
| Total | NC | 79.843 | 3.473 | p-value | PES | ||||||||
| BCLP | 74.819 | 3.859 | Gender | 0.387 | 0.007 | ||||||||
| UCLP | 76.160 | 4.423 | Cleft Type | 0.000 | 0.192 | ||||||||
| UCL | 79.309 | 4.638 | Gender * Cleft Type | 0.654 | 0.021 | ||||||||
| UCLA | 78.209 | 2.811 | |||||||||||
| Total | 77.255 | 4.412 | |||||||||||
SD, standard deviation; MD, mean difference; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; PES, partial eta square.
*
= Significant difference.