Table 3.

Sagittal analysis—SNB: Gender, Types of Cleft and Gender times types of cleft two-way ANOVA analysis results.

Gender	Type	Mean	SD	Cleft type	Mean	Multiple comparison			MD	SE	p-value	95% CI
												Lower bound	Upper bound
Male	NC	75.739	3.548	NC	76.017	NC	vs	BCLP	0.521	1.139	0.648	−1.736	2.777
	BCLP	74.190	5.326	BCLP	75.496		vs	UCLP	−0.214	0.988	0.829	−2.171	1.744
	UCLP	77.032	3.368	UCLP	76.230		vs	UCL	−0.615	1.372	0.655	−3.334	2.104
	UCL	74.916	4.630	UCL	76.632		vs	UCLA	0.100	1.643	0.951	−3.155	3.355
	UCLA	76.490	5.171	UCLA	75.917	BCLP	vs	UCLP	−0.734	1.076	0.496	−2.866	1.397
	Total	75.643	4.395				vs	UCL	−1.136	1.437	0.431	−3.983	1.711
Female	NC	76.295	3.111				vs	UCLA	−0.421	1.697	0.805	−3.783	2.942
	BCLP	76.803	5.139			UCLP	vs	UCL	−0.402	1.321	0.762	−3.018	2.215
	UCLP	75.429	3.497				vs	UCLA	0.314	1.600	0.845	−2.856	3.484
	UCL	78.348	4.859			UCL	vs	UCLA	0.715	1.862	0.702	−2.974	4.405
	UCLA	75.343	3.585
	Total	76.225	3.788
Total	NC	76.044	3.271			p-value	PES
	BCLP	74.910	5.318		Gender	0.399	0.006
	UCLP	76.250	3.484		Cleft Type	0.943	0.007
	UCL	76.500	4.871		Gender * Cleft Type	0.201	0.051
	UCLA	76.108	4.500
	Total	75.898	4.133

SD, standard deviation; MD, mean difference; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; PES, partial eta square.

^*= Significant difference.