Table 4.
Sagittal analysis—ANB: Gender, Types of Cleft and Gender times types of cleft two-way ANOVA analysis results.
| Gender | Type | Mean | SD | Cleft type | Mean | Multiple comparison | MD | SE | p-value | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||||||||||
| Male | NC | 3.556 | 1.800 | NC | 3.778 | NC | vs | BCLP | 4.321* | 1.047 | 0.000 | 2.247 | 6.396 |
| BCLP | 0.465 | 4.604 | BCLP | −0.543 | vs | UCLP | 3.851* | 0.908 | 0.000 | 2.051 | 5.650 | ||
| UCLP | −0.764 | 3.497 | UCLP | −0.073 | vs | UCL | 0.967 | 1.262 | 0.445 | −1.533 | 3.467 | ||
| UCL | 2.794 | 5.857 | UCL | 2.811 | vs | UCLA | 1.650 | 1.511 | 0.277 | −1.342 | 4.643 | ||
| UCLA | 2.052 | 4.138 | UCLA | 2.128 | BCLP | vs | UCLP | −0.470 | 0.989 | 0.635 | −2.430 | 1.489 | |
| Total | 1.092 | 4.190 | vs | UCL | −3.355* | 1.321 | 0.012 | −5.972 | −0.737 | ||||
| Female | NC | 3.999 | 2.683 | vs | UCLA | −2.671 | 1.561 | 0.090 | −5.762 | 0.421 | |||
| BCLP | −1.551 | 5.545 | UCLP | vs | UCL | −2.884* | 1.214 | 0.019 | −5.290 | −0.479 | |||
| UCLP | 0.619 | 3.004 | vs | UCLA | −2.200 | 1.471 | 0.137 | −5.115 | 0.714 | ||||
| UCL | 2.828 | 4.256 | UCL | vs | UCLA | 0.684 | 1.712 | 0.690 | −2.708 | 4.076 | |||
| UCLA | 2.203 | 4.580 | |||||||||||
| Total | 1.695 | 3.982 | |||||||||||
| Total | NC | 3.799 | 2.301 | p-value | PES | ||||||||
| BCLP | −0.091 | 4.865 | Gender | 0.999 | .000 | ||||||||
| UCLP | −0.090 | 3.300 | Cleft Type | 0.000 | 0.188 | ||||||||
| UCL | 2.810 | 4.970 | Gender * Cleft Type | 0.562 | 0.026 | ||||||||
| UCLA | 2.102 | 3.994 | |||||||||||
| Total | 1.357 | 4.094 | |||||||||||
SD, standard deviation; MD, mean difference; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; PES, partial eta square.
*
= Significant difference.